What Is the Role of Ketamine in Perioperative Management?




Introduction


More than 40 years ago during the Vietnam War, ketamine, a nonbarbiturate phencyclidine derivative, was considered an ideal “battlefield anesthetic” because it does not alter hemodynamics and has sedative, hypnotic, analgesic, and amnestic properties. Its popularity waned, however, because of an undesirable side effect profile: hallucinations, delirium, lacrimation, tachycardia, and the potential for an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) and coronary ischemia. Recent reports suggest that with lower doses, ketamine may not be associated with untoward effects and may reduce perioperative pain, prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia, decrease inflammation, reduce bronchoconstriction, and improve the quality of life in a palliative care setting.


Ketamine binds with the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and sigma opioid receptors to produce intense analgesia and a state of “dissociated anesthesia” in which the patient appears calm, does not react to pain, and maintains airway reflexes. Ketamine also interacts with nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, reduces neuronal sodium permeability, and blocks L-type Ca 2+ channels in the muscle and myocardium. Ketamine possesses a chiral center and exists commonly as a mixture of S(+) and R(−) stereoisomers. S(+) ketamine has greater analgesic potency and a shorter duration of action compared with R(−) ketamine because it has a fourfold greater affinity for the NMDA receptor. The liver metabolizes ketamine (via the cytochrome CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 pathways) into norketamine, a weaker active metabolite that is excreted in the urine.




Options/Therapies


Intravenous (IV) (patient-controlled analgesia [PCA]), intramuscular, sublingual, rectal, and epidural administration of ketamine achieves effective plasma levels. Ketamine is not currently approved for intrathecal administration because of the potential neural toxicity.


General Anesthesia


Ketamine crosses the blood–brain barrier rapidly and reaches maximal effect in 1 minute. A single dose of ketamine (2 mg/kg IV) lasts 10 to 15 minutes and the half-life elimination is 2.5 to 3 hours. Ketamine is used in clinical anesthesia as an induction agent to preserve hemodynamic stability, as an adjunctive anesthetic to spare opioid use, and as a sole anesthetic for painful procedures such as dressing changes.


Intensive Care


Concerns about ketamine’s psychotropic effects have limited its use as a sedative-analgesic in the intensive care unit (ICU). Ketamine’s potential advantages include preserved heart rate and blood pressure for patients with poor cardiopulmonary reserve, antagonism of the NMDA receptor in patients experiencing short-term and repetitive pain (e.g., suctioning and turning), decreased opioid consumption, and bronchodilation for patients with status asthmaticus.


Palliative Care


Ketamine has been used as an analgesic and as an antidepressant in the palliative care setting. Reports of “burst doses” of ketamine to relieve symptoms have been published. Despite ketamine’s potential to relieve refractory cancer and neuropathic pain, a systematic review found insufficient evidence to evaluate ketamine’s effectiveness as an adjuvant to opioid treatment in cancer pain.


Organ and Physiologic Responses to Ketamine


Cardiovascular Response


Ketamine acts on the heart via sympathetic-mediated stimulation and inhibition of catecholamine uptake. At clinical concentrations, ketamine has a positive inotropic action and induces vasoconstriction, probably by inhibiting endothelial nitric oxide production, which preserves hemodynamic stability even in septic shock. Ketamine may act as a myocardial depressant in patients who are catecholamine depleted. Its sympathetic activity can be attenuated by concomitant administration of benzodiazepines or alpha-2 agonists. Ketamine has been proposed as an antiarrhythmic agent and an antiinflammatory agent because it inactivates neutrophils and suppresses cytokines.


Respiratory Response


Ketamine causes clinically significant bronchodilation. Potential mechanisms include preventing reuptake of circulating catecholamines to stimulate the beta-2-adrenergic receptor, relaxation of bronchial smooth muscle via vagolysis and reduction of calcium influx, and direct antagonism of histamine. In contrast to other general anesthetics, ketamine preserves functional residual capacity, minute ventilation, and tidal volume and enhances thoracic compliance.


Neurologic Response


Ketamine increases cerebral metabolism and blood flow in patients breathing spontaneously. In patients whose lungs are mechanically ventilated, it preserves cerebral perfusion pressure without increasing intracranial pressure. Ketamine enhances cortical somatosensory evoked potentials and maintains or increases bispectral index values. The potential for neuroprotection against ischemic damage with ketamine is intriguing. During neuronal injury, the NMDA receptor is activated to release Ca 2+ and glutamate by ischemic neurons, which initiate cell necrosis and apoptosis. Blockade of NMDA receptors may be therapeutic. Abolition of dysarthria and tremor in patients with Parkinson disease has been observed. Animal studies suggest that ketamine may cause neuronal cell death in newborns.


Pain Response


Ketamine decreases acute and chronic pain via the NMDA and opioid receptors. Major surgery, burns, trauma, and painful procedures in the ICU can induce prolonged noxious stimuli. Noxious stimuli cause central sensitization and lead to allodynia (a painful response to an innocuous stimulus), hyperalgesia (an exaggerated response to a painful stimulus), and eventually chronic pain syndromes. Administering short-acting opioids can result in early opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia. Ketamine antagonizes the NMDA receptor to block these responses, reducing windup pain and central hyperexcitability. In both animal and human models, subanesthetic ketamine doses prevented these effects from alfentanil, remifentanil, and fentanyl. Ketamine has the potential to decrease opioid requirements and tolerance and to prevent chronic pain.


Gastrointestinal Response


Ketamine inhibits reuptake of serotonin and may activate the chemoreceptor trigger zone to cause nausea and vomiting. Prolonged infusions of opioids such as fentanyl and morphine inhibit bowel function and promote constipation or even prolonged ileus. Ketamine does not inhibit bowel mobility and may reduce the feeding complications associated with opioids.




Evidence


Opioid Sparing


Table 33-1 summarizes randomized controlled trials of adults receiving IV perioperative ketamine. Table 33-2 summarizes meta-analyses of perioperative ketamine use. Recent reviews suggest that ketamine spares opioid use in the perioperative period at subanesthetic doses. In a meta-analysis of studies of more than 2000 patients randomly assigned to perioperative ketamine, subanesthetic ketamine administration reduced rescue analgesic requirements, pain intensity, and 24-hour PCA morphine consumption. Similar findings were reported in a review of randomized trials of ketamine in surgical patients. In a meta-analysis of studies of IV ketamine, opioid-sparing effects were greater in procedures associated with high postoperative pain scores (e.g., upper abdominal, orthopedic, and thoracic surgery). Ketamine’s opioid-sparing effect may not be uniform because different operations produce different stimuli for sensitization.



TABLE 33-1

Randomized Controlled Trials of Perioperative Intravenous Ketamine in Adults





















































































































































































































































































Author Procedure Size Design Intervention Outcome
Roytblat et al (1993) Abdominal N = 22 RDBPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and first 5-hr pain score
Stubhaug et al (1997) Abdominal N = 20 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative versus placebo Increased global satisfaction; no difference in opioid consumption or pain scores except in first few postoperative hours
Mathisen et al (1999) Abdominal (laparoscopic) N = 60 RDBPCT Preincision versus postoperative versus placebo Reduction of pain score in postoperative group only; no difference in opioid consumption
Suzuki et al (1999) Ambulatory N = 140 RPCT Intraoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Adriaenssens et al (1999) Abdominal N = 30 RDBPCT Postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption; no difference in pain score
Heinke and Grimm (1999) Gynecologic N = 39 RPCT Preincision + intraoperative + postoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Menigaux et al (2000) Orthopedic N = 45 RDBPCT Preincision versus postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption over control; no difference between preoperative or postoperative
Dahl et al (2000) Gynecologic N = 89 RDBPCT Preincision versus postincision ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain score in postincision group only
Menigaux et al (2001) Orthopedic (laparoscopic) N = 50 RDBPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo Reduction of analgesic consumption and pain scores
Papaziogas et al (2001) Abdominal (laparoscopic) N = 55 RDBPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Lehmann et al (2001) Urologic (laparoscopic) N = 80 RDBPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Guignard et al (2002) Abdominal N = 50 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Gilabert Morell and Sanchez Perez (2002) Gynecologic N = 69 RDBPCT Preincision versus postoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Jaksch et al (2002) Orthopedic N = 30 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pains scores
Guillou et al (2003) Abdominal N = 101 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative + postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption; no difference in pain scores
Van Elstraete et al (2004) Tonsillectomy N = 40 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Kwok et al (2004) Gynecologic (laparoscopic) N = 135 RDBPCT Preincision versus postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid with preincision; no difference with postoperative
Lahtinen et al (2004) Cardiac N = 90 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative + postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption; no difference with pain scores
Katz et al (2004) Urologic N = 143 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus intraoperative versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Kafali et al (2004) Abdominal N = 60 RPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Kapfer et al (2005) Abdominal N = 77 RDBPCT Postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption
Ganne et al (2005) ENT N = 31 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Karaman et al (2006) Gynecologic N = 60 RPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Pirim et al (2006) Gynecologic N = 45 RPCT Postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Lebrun et al (2006) Oral N = 84 RPCT Preincision versus postoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Gillies et al (2007) Mixed N = 41 RDBPCT Postoperative ketamine versus opioid No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
McKay and Donais (2007) Abdominal N = 42 RDBPCT Postoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores; more hallucinations
Yamauchi et al (2008) Spine N = 202 RPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Engelhardt et al (2008) Spine (pediatric) N = 34 RPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Aveline et al (2009) Orthopedic N = 75 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative + postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Remerand et al (2009) Orthopedic N = 150 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative + postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Sen et al (2009) Gynecologic N = 60 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Deng et al (2009) Orthopedic N = 200 RDBPCT Intraoperative + postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Dullenkopf et al (2009) Mixed N = 120 RDBPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo No difference in total opioid consumption or pain scores
Reza et al (2010) Gynecologic N = 60 RDBPCT Preincision ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption only 0-2 hr postoperatively; no differences thereafter
Lak et al (2010) Abdominal N = 50 RDBPCT Postoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores
Hadi et al (2010) Spine N = 30 RDBCT Intraoperative ketamine versus standard Reduction of opioid consumption and time to first analgesic
Loftus et al (2010) Spine N = 102 RDBPCT Preincision + intraoperative ketamine versus placebo Reduction of opioid consumption and pain scores

ENT, ear, nose, and throat; RDBPCT, randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial; RPCT, randomized placebo-controlled trial.


TABLE 33-2

Meta-Analyses of Perioperative Ketamine












































Author Subjects Intervention Outcome
Elia and Tramer (2005) Ketamine versus no ketamine (n = 2721) in adult and pediatric population Perioperative ketamine (bolus/infusion/epidural/caudal/PCA) versus conventional analgesic Reduction of total opioid consumption and decreased pain scores
Bell et al (2006) Ketamine versus placebo (n = 2240) in adult population Intraoperative ketamine (bolus or infusion or epidural) versus placebo or conventional analgesic Reduction of total opioid consumption and decreased pain scores
Bell et al (2006) Ketamine + opioid versus opioid only (n = 432) in adult population Postoperative PCA with ketamine + opioid versus PCA with opioid Reduction in opioid consumption in first 24 hr
Carstensen and Moller (2010) Ketamine + opioid versus opioid only (n = 887) in adult population Postoperative PCA with ketamine + opioid versus PCA with opioid No clear advantage of ketamine over opioid PCA except in thoracic surgery
Laskowski et al (2011) Ketamine versus placebo (n = 4701) in adult population Intraoperative ketamine (bolus or infusion) versus placebo Reduction in total opioid consumption and increased time to first opioid
Dahmani et al (2011) Ketamine versus no ketamine (n = 985) in pediatric population Ketamine (systemic, local, and caudal) versus conventional analgesic Decreased PACU pain scores and nonopioid analgesic, no opioid-sparing effect
Schnabel et al (2011) Ketamine + local versus local only (n = 584) in pediatric population Intraoperative ketamine (caudal) + local versus local (caudal) Reduction in rescue analgesic and increased time to first analgesic

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Mar 2, 2019 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on What Is the Role of Ketamine in Perioperative Management?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access