(1)
Botulinum Toxin Treatment Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Abstract
Focal dystonia is a common neurological disorder which is often painful. This chapter reviews clinical features of three common and painful focal dystonias, namely, cervical dystonia, focal dystonia associated with neurodegenerative disorders, and post-traumatic dystonia. The literature on the efficacy of botulinum toxins for these three forms of dystonic pain is reviewed. Fourteen blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trials assessed pain at baseline and after BoNT treatment of cervical dystonia. All 14 reported efficacy against pain. CD-related pain responded also to all three types of A neurotoxins as well as the type B neurotoxin. Small retrospective studies and clinical observations demonstrate that currently available neurotoxins (A or B) improve pain of Parkinson-related dystonias (toe flexion and foot inversion) as well as painful post-traumatic dystonias. Blinded studies for these indications are not available. Case reports and short videotape clips from author’s experience are provided to demonstrate patients’ histories and the technique of BoNT administration.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this chapter (10.1007/978-1-4939-2501-8_12) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords
Cervical dystoniaDystonic painParkinson’s diseaseAtypical Parkinson disordersPost-traumatic dystoniaPainBotulinum toxinBotulinum neurotoxinOnabotulinumtoxinA (onaA)AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboA)IncobotulinumtoxinA (incoA)RimabotulinumtoxinB (rimaB)Introduction
Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained twisting and turning and abnormal postures. The recent classification defines two diagnostic axis, clinical and etiological (Albanese et al. 2013). Classification in the clinical axis is based on the age at onset, temporal pattern of dystonia, body distribution (focal, hemidystonia, segmental, multifocal, and generalized), and coexistence of other movement disorders and other neurological or systemic manifestations. The etiological axis encompasses idiopathic, inherited, and acquired dystonias. Focal dystonias can be idiopathic, inherited, or acquired and in any of these settings can be painful.
In this chapter, three common and often painful focal dystonias will be discussed: cervical dystonia, focal dystonia in neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson’s disease and atypical Parkinson disorders), and post-traumatic/postsurgical limb dystonia.
Cervical Dystonia
Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common form of idiopathic focal dystonia with an incidence of 1.07 per 100,000 person-years (Steeves et al. 2012) and a prevalence rate of 8.9/100,000 (Nutt et al. 1988). It is a late onset dystonia which typically affects head and shoulder muscles. Dystonic head jerks (usually in the direction of limited head movements) and limitations of neck movement are the hallmarks of the disorder. Patients commonly complain about neck and shoulder pain which for many is the most disturbing symptom. Based on the pattern and posture of the head deviation, cervical dystonia is classified as torticollis (head rotation), laterocollis (head tilt), retrocollis (head bent back), and anterocollis (head bent forward). Patients may have more than one type of cervical dystonia. The most common combination is torticollis and laterocollis.
In 1991, two retrospective studies from Baylor Medical College in Houston (Jankovic et al. 1991) and Columbia University in New York (Chan et al. 1991) defined characteristic of CD in a sizeable number of patients (in 300 and 266 patients, respectively). The basic data regarding CD was fairly similar between the two institutions regarding mean age at onset (41.9 vs. 41 years), female preponderance (1.9:1 vs. 1.5:1), and occurrence of pain (67 % vs. 75 %). In the Baylor series, pain was the presenting symptom in 17 % of the patients.
Progress in genetic testing has identified several genes in the familial forms of cervical dystonia starting with DYT6 a form of cervicocranial dystonia with the onset in young age and tendency to generalization. More recently, whole-exome sequencing has identified several genetic abnormalities in families with adult onset cervical dystonia (Skogseid 2014). GNAL gene which encodes for G protein (important in dopamine signaling) is the latest of these discoveries (Fuchs et al. 2013).
Very recently, the result of a large multicenter, prospective study on clinical features of pain in CD (CD-Probe study) has been published (Charles et al. 2014). The study was conducted at 88 centers in the USA and included 1,037 participants. The study compared the demographic and clinical profiles of CD patients with no/mild pain and those with moderate/severe pain. It assessed the impact of pain and the motor component of CD on quality of life and compared the initial onabotulinum toxin treatment paradigm between groups. The most common types of CD were torticollis (47.6 %) and laterocollis (38.8 %) with retrocollis and anterocollis considerably less common than the first two (5.3 and 5.7 %, respectively).
Pain was assessed through several questionnaires:
1.
Pain numeric rating scale (PNRS) range 0–10. Based on this questionnaire, the level of pain was defined as mild (<4), moderate (4–6), and severe (7–10).
2.
Via CD impact profile-58 which has eight subsets; one of eight pertains to pain.
3.
Pain subset (0–20) of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS).
Through these scales, a number of other parameters were also assessed: severity of torticollis, disability, head and neck symptoms, pain and discomfort, upper limb activities, walking, sleep, annoyance, mood, psychosocial functioning (each ranging from 0 to 100), work productivity, and type of CD (anterocollis, laterocollis, retrocollis, or torticollis).
The results showed that 88.9 % of the patients reported pain related to CD at baseline and 70.7 % rated their CD-related pain as moderate or severe at baseline (PNRS score 4–10). Comparing the group with moderate to severe pain (4–10 on the scale of 0–10) with the no or mild pain (0–3) group, patients with moderate to severe pain were significantly younger (P < 0.0001). Gender, race, and ethnicity were not different between the two groups. A higher percentage of patients among moderate to severe pain group was disabled (14.7 % vs. 4.9 %) (P < 0.0001), and those in the moderate to severe pain group were twice more likely to have stopped work because of CD (P < 0.019). Moderate/severe pain was a significant predictor that employment status would be affected by CD (P = 0.0001). When the impact of pain on different subsets of CDIP-58 questionnaire was studied, pain had a larger impact than motor findings on mood, annoyance, sleep, head and neck, and upper limb activities, while pain and motor component had an equal impact on walking and psychosocial functioning.
Treatment
Anticholinergic and GABAergic drugs (benzodiazepines and baclofen) are both effective in reducing the symptoms of cervical dystonia including the pain. In the former category, trihexyphenidyl (6–30 mg/day) and benztropine (1–3 mg day) are the two most commonly used drugs. Baclofen (30–60 mg day) and diazepam (10–30 mg/day) also improve symptoms of CD. Clonazepam 2.5–1 mg three times daily is also helpful especially when CD is associated with cervical myoclonus. All aforementioned drugs need to be started at low dose and gradually built up over several weeks. Elderly patients have poor tolerance for anticholinergic medications, and many such patients also find baclofen hard to tolerate. Patients who fail pharmacological treatment may benefit from selective cervical rhizotomy (cutting the cervical nerve roots) under careful electrophysiological guidance. The procedure should be performed in specialized centers. In recent years, deep brain stimulation has been employed for the treatment of recalcitrant cases of cervical dystonia. Although the number of treated patients is still small, pallidal stimulation seems to be effective as a secondary therapeutic option for severe CD (Walsh et al. 2013).
Introduction of BoNTs for the treatment of cervical dystonia has revolutionized the management of this disorder. All types of BoNTs (ona, abo, inco, and rima, types A and B) have been proven effective with a rate of efficacy of over 80 % and safety profile unmatched by any other therapeutic modality. Treatment improves all major symptoms of CD and prevents development of contractures and radiculopathy (Jankovic 2004). More favorable results have been reported in one study in which BoNT therapy was combined with physical therapy (Tassorelli et al. 2006). In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis (Marsh et al. 2014) which assessed 18 studies and over 1,900 patients, the mean duration of onaA effect was 93.2 and 95.2 days for fixed and random effect models, respectively. Doses of over 180 units of onaA for the treatment of cervical dystonia produced longer-lasting effects (107–109 days vs. 86–88 days for doses of <180 units).
One of the most important early observations in treatment of CD with botulinum neurotoxins (in this case onaA) was the recognition that neck pain relief in CD often occurred before improvement of posture and limitation of head movement (Jankovic and Schwartz 1990). This important early observation suggested an analgesic effect for botulinum toxins in human, independent from its other effects which proved to be correct in the following years.
Effects of BoNTs on Pain Associated with Cervical Dystonia
Among the double-blind studies which have reported on the efficacy of BoNTs in cervical dystonia, 14 included assessment of pain.
In the pioneering study of Tsui et al. (1986), 14 of 16 patients with CD reported significant reduction of neck pain after administration of onabotulinumtoxinA into the neck and shoulder muscles (0.002). In a larger study of 55 patients, Greene et al. (1990) also reported significant pain relief of their subjects 6 weeks after administration of onaA for CD. In another study of 23 patients, 19 of whom complained of pain, Lorentz et al. (1991) reported pain relief in 12 of 19 patients who were injected by onaA, but only in 1 of 19 subjects injected by saline (P = 0.002). Lew et al. (1997) conducted an efficacy and safety study on 122 patients with CD evaluating the effects of 2,500, 5,000, and 1,000 units of rimaB against placebo (saline). Pain was assessed through the pain subset of TWSTRS and the visual analog scale (VAS). At 4 weeks, all three doses had produced significant pain relief compared to the placebo (P < 0.05). This relief was more pronounced for the largest dose used in the study (<0.004). Poewe et al. (1998), in a study of 31 patients with neck pain and CD, also found a clear difference in pain improvement in favor of aboA (compared to placebo) at 4 weeks. The difference between the three dose groups of toxin (250, 500, and 1,000 units), however, was not significant.
In 1999, two studies assessed the efficacy of rimabotulinumtoxinB (rimaB) in cervical dystonia and associated pain. In one study (Brashear et al.), the investigators compared the efficacy of 5,000 and 10,000 units of rimaB with placebo in 109 patients using visual analog scales. Compared to placebo, at 4 weeks, significant reduction of pain was noted in both toxin groups compared to placebo; 5,000 unit group (P = 0.001) and 10,000 unit group (P = 0.0002). Overall, the TWSTRS scores also improved more in the 10,000 unit group. In the same year, Brin et al. (1999) published the results of another investigation on efficacy of rimaB versus placebo in 77 patients with CD. Administration of 10,000 units of rimaB improved neck pain significantly at 4 weeks (P < 0.001). Wissel et al. (2001) studied 68 patients with CD (with minimum Tsui score of 9) comparing the effect of aboA (500 units) with placebo (saline). Patients were assessed at weeks 4, 8, and 12 with Tsui scale rating the severity of CD and pain. At week 4, 49 patients in aboA group were pain-free versus 33 patients in the saline group (P = 0.02). In the following open phase of the study, the aboA group demonstrated significant pain relief (P = 0.011). Truong et al. (2005) investigated the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboA) (500 units) in 80 patients with CD. Participants were followed up for 4–20 weeks, until they needed further treatment. The efficacy was assessed with TWSTRS at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 after treatment. Pain was evaluated via pain subset of TWSTRS on VAS scale of 0–100 mm. At 4 weeks, the reduction in VAS score was 13.4 for aboA group and 1.9 for the placebo group (P = 0.02). This significant degree of pain reduction was also noted at week 8.
In the past 3 years, four multicenter studies in a sizeable number of patients with CD-related pain and botulinum toxin therapy have been published (Truong et al. 2010; Comella et al. 2011; Charles et al. 2012; Fernandez et al. 2013). Truong et al. (2010) reported on the results of a multicenter study of 116 patients (61 placebos) with CD after administration of 500 units of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboA) into the neck and shoulder muscles. Four weeks after administration of aboA, the VAS score was reduced 3.7 for the onaA group and 1.4 for the placebo group, respectively. Comella et al. (2011) reported on the efficacy of two doses of incobotulinumtoxinA (incoA), 120 and 240 units on 233 patients with cervical dystonia. Both doses were equally effective in improving all subsets of the TWSTRS including pain. The pain subset of TWSTRS (0–20) was markedly improved (P < 0.0001) at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. In another study (Charles et al. 2012), the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA (mean dose 241 unit) versus placebo was assessed in 170 patient with cervical dystonia (88 onaA, 82 placebo) using dystonia severity scale and physicians global assessment scale at baseline and 6 weeks after injection. Evaluation of pain subset showed significant improvement (P < 0.05) at 2, 4, and 6 weeks posttreatment in the toxin group versus placebo. In a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Fernandez et al. (2013) studied the effect of two doses (120 and 240 units) of incobotulinumtoxinA in 233 patients with CD. Pain was assessed through TWSTRS pain subset. At 4 weeks postinjection, patients in both 120 and 240 groups demonstrated significant reduction of neck pain (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in pain response between the two prescribed doses of the neurotoxin. In contrast, Kaji et al. (2013), using the TWSTRS pain subset, found doses of 2,500 and 5,000 units of rimabotulinumtoxinA (rimaA) ineffective in alleviating the pain of cervical dystonia at 4 weeks following toxin administration. The 10,000 unit dose, however, improved the pain significantly (P < 0.05).
Comparator Studies
Same Toxin, Different Doses
Laubis-Herrmann et al. (2002) studied the effect of high-dose (500 units) and low-dose (130 units) aboA administration for pain relief in CD. Subjects who received high dose (assessed by pain subset of TWSTRS at 6 weeks postinjection) reported pain relief (P < 0.03), while those on the low dose only showed a trend toward improvement (P < 0.06). However, in most other measures of the TWSTRS, the response did not differ between the two groups.
Different Toxins
Ranoux et al. (2002) compared the efficacy of onaA and two different doses of aboA (3:1 ratio to onaA and 4:1 ratio to onaA) in a blinded study of 54 patients with CD. Function was assessed through Tsui scale (0–25) and pain through the pain subset of TWSTRS. All three toxin preparations relieved pain. Both aboA preparations were more effective than onaA in respect to pain relief (0.04 and 0.02 for 3:1 and 4:1, respectively). There was a difference between the toxins in respect to side effects. OnaA produced considerably less dysphagia than either of the two preparations of aboA (3 % vs. 15 % and 17 %).
Another comparator study (Comella et al. 2005) compared the efficacy of onaA with rimaB using TWSTRS in 139 CD patients (previously treated with onaA). Efficacy against symptoms of CD was evaluated at 4 weeks (pain was assessed via the pain subset of TWSTRS). Administration of both toxins relieved the neck pain significantly (P < 0.001). The drop in the pain score was 3.2 for onaA and 4 for rimaB, respectively (not a significant difference).
Pappert et al. (2008), in a non-inferiority study, compared efficacy, safety, and duration of onaA (150 units) and rimaB (10,000 units) in 111 toxin-naïve cervical dystonia (CD) subjects. Fifty-six of 111 subjects received placebo. Pain was assessed through the pain subset of TWSTRS along with other assessments at baseline and at 4 weeks following treatment. Both toxins were found to be equally effective in improving symptoms of CD (P = 0.001) and pain. One patient in the rimaB group developed moderate dysphagia which improved spontaneously.
Another study (Quagliato et al. 2010) comparing 300 units of onabotulinumtoxinA with 300 units of Prosigne (Chinese toxin from Lanzhou Institute) found both equally effective in relieving pain at 4 and 16 weeks (using form SF36, pain subset). The study had 12 patients in each group (toxin and placebo). The authors suggested equal units for onaA and Prosigne.
Brans et al. (1996) compared the efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA with trihexyphenidyl in 66 patients with cervical. In the aboA group, subjects received two injections of the neurotoxin at week 0 and week 8 (mean dose 292 units and 262 units for weeks 0 and 8, respectively). The dose in the trihexyphenidyl group was up to 24 mg/day. Pain assessment (pain subset of TWSTRS) was performed at week 12 (4 weeks after the second injection). Although more patients in the aboA group demonstrated pain relief compared to the trihexyphenidyl group, the difference was not statistically significant.