The Innate Immune System

Chapter 90 The Innate Immune System




The immune response aims to ward off pathogens and mitigate injury. Traditionally a distinction is made between adaptive and innate immune responses. The adaptive immune system has been studied in the greater detail and is essentially a specific response to individual pathogens. Adaptive immunity is a highly sophisticated process with many safety mechanisms to target responses at pathogens (or pathogen-infected cells) while leaving normal tissues alone. This sophistication and specificity takes time to develop (days to weeks) and has many effector cells and molecules to deliver a coordinated response (T and B lymphocytes, immunoglobulins). Although the adaptive response is essential for health and in particular for the phenomenon of immunological memory, it is not sufficient to address a sudden major bacteremia or widespread tissue injury—or even the thousands of minor bacterial inoculums all individuals experience during their lifetimes—for example, during teeth brushing. Bacterial growth is exponential under optimal conditions—Neisseria meningitides counts can double in 20 minutes. Given these threats, there is a need for a “ready-made” system that can act swiftly to neutralize external threats. This is called the innate immune system.


In humans, the innate immune system is largely present at birth (in contrast to the years it takes to build an adaptive immune repertoire). Innate immunity is phylogenetically conserved and found in nearly all multicellular organisms; again, this contrasts with the adaptive immune system that is found in vertebrates only. Its hallmarks are immediacy, promiscuousness, redundancy, and generality. Given that the adaptive immune system evolved in the presence of innate immunity, these systems do not operate in isolation from each other; rather the innate immune system presents to and instructs the adaptive part of immunity.


Innate immunity encompasses immune cells, such as tissue macrophages, neutrophils, and monocytes, but also cells that are primarily known for other functions: platelets and endothelial cells. Complex networks of circulating mediators including the complement cascade, collectins, defensins, and the coagulation cascade are integral parts of innate immunity. Recent work has highlighted apparent contributions from neurohumoral and autonomic nervous systems.


No critically ill child is admitted to intensive care without activation of its innate immune system. No intensivist can function adequately without a good working knowledge of innate immunity, because it is central to many of the clinical entities he or she faces on a day-to-day basis. Infection, trauma, ischemia-reperfusion, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and cardiopulmonary bypass sequelae are all largely mediated by the innate immune system.


The immune system can be considered as a complex tool to distinguish tissues that are “infectious non-self” from “noninfectious self.”1 More recently a distinction between “dangerous” and “nondangerous” matter has been proposed as a better description for innate immunity.2


This chapter provides a framework and outline of concepts in innate immunity that will help understand some of the pathophysiological processes central to pediatric critical care.



Components of the Innate Immune System


An ideal first-line response to invading microbes would readily recognize and promptly neutralize infectious agents without widespread collateral tissue injury. The innate immune system achieves these objectives to some degree by a combination of circulating molecules that either cause direct pathogen lysis or prime pathogens for phagocytosis and by phagocytic cells themselves.


Complement, lectins, and defensins are important humoral defenses. The main cellular components are neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Platelets and endothelial cells are now understood to have innate immune functions also. There are complex interactions between these components as well as with the coagulation, endocrine, and the autonomic nervous systems.


The afferent, or “sensing,” limb of the innate immune system consists of pattern recognition molecules that recognize typical molecular structures on pathogenic micro-organisms. Gram-negative lipopolysaccharide and Gram-positive lipoteichoic acid are obvious targets, but pattern recognition molecules are also directed against characteristic non-human patterns of sugars involving mannose, glucose, fructose, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and N-acetyl-mannosamine. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) binds to all of these and thus recognizes a wide variety of bacteria, viruses, yeasts, fungi and protozoa, but also endogenous ligands.3


The importance of these danger signals is illustrated by the number of names competing in the literature to describe them: pathogen-associated molecular patterns, danger associated molecular patterns, and most recently alarmins.4 Whatever name used, the importance is that when such patterns encounter pattern recognition molecules of the innate immune system, they initiate and/or potentiate a cascade of events that is aimed at rapid killing of invading pathogens or reestablishing immune homeostasis.



Circulating Pattern Recognition Receptors: Complement, Lectins, and Defensins


Pattern recognition molecules also circulate in the bloodstream. The lectin-complement pathway facilitates pathogen removal via carbohydrate recognition mediated phagocytosis. The alternative complement pathway is a continuously activated bactericidal humoral mechanism.


Sugar-recognizing collectins, molecules that contain collagenous structures and C-type carbohydrate recognizing domains (CRD) include MBLs and surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and SP-D). Mannose binding lectin is a liver derived acute phase reactant whereas SP-A and SP-D are synthesized in the lung. The main determinant of MBL levels is genotype, whereas SP-A and SP-D do increase significantly with inflammatory stress. Collectins bind to many microbes: viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa and prepare organisms for phagocytosis (opsonization) and activate complement pathways. The ficolins, L-ficolin, M-ficolin, H-ficolin, are similar but they have different structures with a fibrinogen-like domain. Both MBL and the ficolins initiate the lectin pathway of complement activation via associated serine proteases.5


Similarly, antimicrobial proteins such as bactericidal/permeability increasing protein and lactoferrin have pathogen killing properties. Notably, these factors do not induce a downstream cytokine response.


Alarmins, such as α and β defensins, and cathelicidins are expressed in neutrophils, intestinal Paneth cells, and epithelial cells in the respiratory tract. Defensin synthesis and release occurs constitutively but increases with cellular activation. Defensins exert a dose-dependent direct bactericidal activity and function as chemo-attractants for phagocytes. They also act generally to increase phagocytic function by increasing production of reactive oxygen species, binding to C1q to activate the classical complement pathway and inhibiting the production of immunosuppressive adrenal glucocorticoids.6



Neutrophils


Neutrophils are a key element in the rapid clearance of bacterial and fungal invasion. They are equipped to sense pathogens, to migrate toward them, and subsequently to ingest and kill them. Neutrophils typically circulate for only of 6 to 8 hours after release from the bone marrow. They “scan” the vascular endothelium for signs of local inflammation by rolling on weak adhesion molecules (selectins). When the endothelium displays signs of local inflammation or injury—such as a high local concentration of interleukin-8 (IL-8), neutrophils alter the structure of their main adhesion molecules (β2-integrins) and firmly adhere to the site of trouble. They then pass through the endothelium and hunt pathogens (or injured tissue) in need of removal. They may digest pathogens or tissue with a combination of enzymes such as elastase and they eat their fill through phagocytosis. Organisms that are phagocytosed into neutrophil vacuoles are then subjected to protease activity and changes in charge conditions—that disrupt the bacterial membranes by ion shifts. Ideally, once spent, the full neutrophil quietly undergoes apoptosis—the debris of which is phagocytosed in due course.


The degree of local (and subsequently systemic) inflammation is determined to some degree by the balance between the numbers of infective organisms and the extent of neutrophil recruitment and activation. An inadequate neutrophil response means the infection is unlikely to be controlled as a minor local problem—hence, the very high frequency of bacterial blood stream infections that occur in patients who are neutropenic after chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. Patients who are unable to localize neutrophils to the endothelium and hence the tissue (via congenital failures of firm adhesion: “leukocyte adhesion deficiencies”) typically fail to heal normally minor wounds—but bacteremias are less common. Finally, in the most severe forms of purpura fulminans associated with overwhelming bacterial infection, typically circulating neutrophil counts are low, reflecting the very widespread endothelial activation and injury. This means the whole circulating neutrophil pool is depleted by adhesion to multiple sites of infection and damage. Neutropenia in this scenario is a very powerful predictor of poor outcome and reflects a severe infection that has outstripped the host’s early control mechanisms.



Cellular Pattern Recognition Receptors


The archetypal pathogen-associated molecular pattern is the gram-negative cell wall component lipopolysaccharide (LPS), to which humans are exquisitely sensitive. Endotoxin or LPS is recognized by the humoral factor LPS binding protein and the cell membrane receptor toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). LPS binding protein, a liver-derived glycoprotein, binds to LPS and shuttles it to an immune cell surface (e.g., a monocyte). The monocyte receives the LPS binding protein/LPS compound on a complex consisting of TLR4, CD14, and MD2. On binding, the transmembrane receptor TLR4 signals to intracellular components, that in turn, activate nuclear factor κB (NFκB)-mediated downstream gene expression cytokine activation (Figure 90-1). Thus a gram-negative infection such as meningococcemia gives rise to a rapid nonspecific response that aims to kill the inoculum and contain the infection.


image

Figure 90–1 LBP shepherds LPS to the TLR4 complex. On ligation, TLR4 dimerizes and activates the two distinct MyD88- and MyD88-independent TRIF-dependent pathways. The early inflammatory phase is characterized by the MyD88-dependent pathway. This pathway activates MAPKinase and NFκB mediated pro-inflammatory gene induction. The TRIF-dependent pathway will activate late-phase NFκB and IRF3 mediated gene expression resulting in a more endotoxin tolerant response.3840 LBP, Lipopolysaccharide binding protein; LPS, lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin); CD14, cluster of differentiation 14; MD2, myeloid differentiation protein 2; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88; MAL/TIRAP, MyD88 adaptor like/Toll-interleukin 1 receptor (TIR) domain containing adaptor protein; IRAK4, interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 4; IRAK1, Interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 1; TAK1, transforming growth factor β-associated kinase 1; TRIF, TIR domain-containing adaptor protein inducing interferon β; TRAM, TRIF-related adaptor molecule; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factor 6; TRAF3, tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factor 3; TANK, TRAF family member–associated NFκB activator; TBK1, TANK binding kinase 1; IKKε, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase ε; IKKα, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase α; IKKβ, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase β; p38, p38 kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAPKs, mitogen activated protein kinases; NEMO, nuclear factor κB essential modulator; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; IκB, inhibitor κB; NFκB, nuclear factor κB; AP-1, activator protein 1.


TLR4 is only one of a family of related molecules. There are at least 10 related receptors in humans (Table 90-1). These TLRs are evolutionary preserved from the worm Caenorhabditis elegans and strikingly homologous to Toll, a gene product essential to Drosophila immunity. These TLRs are transmembrane glycoproteins that are characterized by an extracellular binding domain with varying numbers of leucine-rich-repeat motifs and an intracellular cytoplasmic signaling domain homologous to that of the interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R). This Toll/IL-1R homology (TIR) domain sits beneath the plasma membrane and interfaces primarily with the key signaling adaptor myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88).7



TLR2 recognizes cell wall component lipoteichoic acid and peptidoglycan of Gram-positive bacteria, whereas TLR5 recognizes flagellin on Salmonella enterica. Viral matter is recognized by TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8. TLRs also combine in heterodimers and thus generate wider ligand specificity, for instance TLR6/TLR2 recognizes the fungal cell wall component zymosan. TLR9 recognizes bacterial DNA, which is distinct from mammal DNA by way of the presence of unmethylated CpG dinucleotides.


One TLR may also recognize different pathogen components; TLR4 not only binds LPS, but also the structurally unrelated fusion protein of respiratory syncytial virus and Plasmodium falciparum glycosylphosphatidylinositol. Recently, TLR4 has been observed to ligate endogenous molecules such as heat shock proteins and fibrinogen. These interesting observations suggest that these pathways contribute to the ongoing immune response from other insults such as trauma rather than being specific to individual pathogens. This fits with a danger model of immunity, rather than a strict pathogen non-self and non–pathogen self model.


TLRs are expressed on many immune and nonimmune cells, including macrophages, platelets, and cardiac myocytes. This expression is modulated rapidly in response to pathogens and cytokines. Many of these TLRs (e.g., TLR1, -2, -4, -5), are expressed on the cell wall, others are found intracellularly (e.g., TLR3, -7, -9).


A different type of pattern recognition receptors recognize pathogens after invasion in the cytosol. RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) respond to viral RNA. Activation induces NFκB-mediated gene transcription and production of type I interferon (INF). Of particular relevance to the intensivist are the nucleotide binding oligomerization domain and leucine rich repeat containing molecules (NLRs). The best studied of these proteins, NOD1 and NOD2, both contain N-terminal CARD domains and are specialized in detection of bacterial peptidoglycan components. Two types of activation occur: NOD1 and NOD2 ligation causes their oligomerization, that in turn induces downstream gene expression via NFκB activation. Alternatively, NLRs activate caspase-1 activating complexes, also known as inflammasomes, that in turn mature cytokines IL1-β and IL-18.8 Inflammasomes may be seen as sensors for danger. For instance, loss of cell integrity activates the inflammasome and hence the potent pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β. The significance of this pathway is increasingly recognized. Recent data show the inflammasome to be integral to the pathogenesis of severe Staphylococcus aureus infections.9

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Jul 7, 2016 | Posted by in CRITICAL CARE | Comments Off on The Innate Immune System

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access