Chapter 19 Splints and Slings
For online-only figures, please go to www.expertconsult.com
Splints and slings have been staples of medical care for thousands of years. For instance, orthopedic splinting was well documented in ancient Egypt more than 5000 years ago1,33 (Figure 19-1, online).
FIGURE 19-1 A fractured and splinted forearm showing signs of healing. Egyptian mummy from Dynasty V.
(From Arab S: Medicine in ancient Egypt. http://www.arabworldbooks.com/articles8b.htm.)
First and foremost, splints and slings stabilize injuries by limiting movement (Box 19-1). Limiting movement minimizes pain and decreases potential further tissue damage. Splinting eases transportation from the field, minimizes blood loss, and aids in healing.12 In general, all fractures and dislocations should be splinted before transport unless the patient’s life is at immediate risk or the rescue scene is unsafe.13 Basic splint types include rigid, soft, anatomic, and traction. Splint choice is based on fracture type and available materials. In improvisational situations, splints can be made from just about any material. Examples include newspapers, pillows, umbrellas, and other supportive materials5 (Figure 19-2).
Spinal Immobilization
Spinal cord injuries are rare, affecting 40 to 50 individuals per million annually in the United States. These injuries may result in long-term disability.22 The 5 million people each year who are placed in spinal immobilization after traffic collisions contribute to the majority of spinal cord injuries. In one wilderness study, 3.6% of mountain trauma patients who were alive when rescued had spinal injuries.12
Indications for Spinal Immobilization
The most common scenario for prehospital spinal immobilization is an injury sustained during a motor vehicle collision. All-terrain vehicles, automobiles, snowmobiles, motorcycles, and other off-road vehicles are the most common causes of high-force spinal trauma in the wilderness setting. Falls and other high-force mechanisms are also concerning. Worrisome symptoms include spine pain or palpable tenderness, altered mental status, neurologic complaints, head injury, extremes of age, or an unreliable examination that involves a distracting injury, alcohol or drug use, or a communication barrier6 (Box 19-2).
Spinal immobilization is intended to prevent worsening of an existing spinal cord injury or the creation of a spinal cord injury in the case of a ligamentous disruption. The medical literature has multiple reports of worsening neurologic deficits after patients with spinal cord injuries are moved.6,34,35 Extreme settings mandate a different interpretation of “urban” recommendations to fit the survival wilderness scenario. Wilderness data are limited, so prehospital spinal immobilization is prudent when practical.
Spinal immobilization is not performed without reservation. Backboards and collars may increase discomfort. Airway management may be restricted and evacuation times increased with spinal immobilization. However spinal immobilization remains the standard of care when practical in the wilderness setting.12 Further research is indicated to better classify appropriate indications and to further assess the risk-benefit ratio for spinal immobilization in the wilderness.
Cervical Spine Immobilization
High cervical spine (C-spine) injuries have great potential for morbidity and disability. The goals of C-spine immobilization are to minimize movement and maintain a “neutral” alignment. Standard C-spine immobilization is performed with a hard collar in conjunction with a backboard and lateral support devices. The modern standard cervical collar has five contact points and makes use of the head, C-spine, and thorax. The thorax contact points include the trapezius muscles (posterior), clavicle, and sternum (anterior). Hard collars alone do not adequately limit cervical motion. Backboards and lateral support devices are required in conjunction with a hard collar (Figures 19-3 and 19-4). The patient’s neck requires manual stabilization in a neutral, in-line position until he or she is fully immobilized. Standard emergency medical services equipment includes lateral support devices (foam or plastic). In the wilderness setting, these devices can be improvised by rolling clothes, sheets, or blankets and placing them on both sides of head while securing everything in place with tape17 (see Figure 19-2).
Cervical Spine Application
The application of a C-spine immobilization device depends on the position in which the patient is found and the device that is available. Universal application diagrams are generally helpful with regard to in-line stabilization, neutral neck alignment, chin positioning, and collar placement. Diagrams for application of C-spine collars on both upright and supine patients are easily referenced and generally intuitive (Figure 19-5). Diagrams for application of improvised C-spine collars or C-spine collars on patients who are found in sitting positions are also helpful (Figures 19-6 to 19-9; Figure 19-8, online).
Special Considerations
Special populations require accurately sized equipment. This includes people with extra long or short necks for which a standard cervical hard collar is not effective. Children who are less than 8 years old are at risk for further injury when immobilized on a standard backboard because of a proportionately large head, which may cause increased flexion during a collision.36 Modifications to counter this anatomic feature include raising the shoulders to the level of the head by placing a pad underneath the shoulders (Figure 19-10). This should be considered for all children who are on backboards.28,29
Improvisational techniques
The key ingredients to an improvisational C-spine device include maximizing stability and fit while limiting airway compromise and allowing access for mouth opening, thus limiting aspiration risk.14 A “horse collar” technique involves a towel, blanket, or other available and malleable material rolled to the desired thickness and placed underneath the patient’s neck. The ends are then crossed over the patient’s chest and secured. As with the cervical hard collar, the patient’s C-spine is maintained in a neutral position during application and for as long as possible afterward by manual in-line stabilization2,6 (see Figure 19-6).
A structural aluminum malleable (SAM) splint can also be molded into a C-spine collar. Studies have shown it to be as effective as a Philadelphia collar, with the advantage of being small, lightweight, versatile, and portable. These characteristics are advantageous in the wilderness setting26 (see Figure 19-7).
Complications of Cervical spine stabilization
Studies have shown that C-spine collars cause increased intracranial pressure, which may be clinically significant for patients with head injuries. Therefore hard cervical collars should be removed immediately after exclusion of a C-spine injury, especially among patients with head injuries. C-spine collars may also be contraindicated in patients with penetrating neck injuries, because they may interfere with management of neck wounds or even conceal these wounds. Penetrating wounds to the spinal cord are rare. Cervical immobilization creates the real possibility of causing greater morbidity than protection.18,19
Thoracolumbar Immobilization
A full-length backboard best accomplishes immobilization of the thoracolumbar spine. In addition, a cervical collar, lateral neck stabilizers, and backboard straps are essential for full spinal immobilization. If the patient is already upright, standing, or lying supine, application of a full-body backboard is straightforward, as described later in this chapter. However, with the suspected cervical injury of a seated patient, an intermediate device is required. There are many forms of this short board, such as a Kendrick Extrication Device (see Figure 19-9). Short boards are applied only after manual in-line stabilization and cervical collar placement. When the short board is in place, the patient can be safely transferred to a full backboard device.6
Strict contraindications for spinal immobilization are few but include emergency evacuation from an unsafe environment. Examples of such environments, with the risk of impending danger, include toxic spills, fire hazards, congested traffic areas, and other situations in which the application of an immobilization device would delay immediate evacuation to safety. In these dangerous situations, expedited removal with manual cervical stabilization is advised.21 When the patient is in a safe location, full spinal immobilization should be applied.
Choices for full-body splints include hard backboards, scoop stretchers, and full-body vacuum splints (Figures 19-11 to 19-13). Full-body hard backboards are used for their ease of application, availability, and effectiveness. Unfortunately, their size and weight make them undesirable for backcountry use, so they are often improvised in the field. Secured straps minimize spinal movement during transport. These are especially important with vomiting patients, when the airway is potentially compromised and a quick change of position is required to allow for removal and drainage of emesis.6 Hard backboards are uncomfortable. Spinal pain that is induced by a backboard may be misinterpreted, and this can complicate and delay therapy.16
FIGURE 19-12 Example of a full-body vacuum splint used for wilderness rescue.
(Courtesy Sheri Trbovich and the Weber County Sheriff Department, Utah.)
Vacuum splint devices offer certain advantages over rigid hard backboards. They can be applied more quickly, and are significantly more comfortable. They also offer a similar degree of spinal immobilization.20 During mountain rescue, vacuum splints are the preferred device for total spinal immobilization (see Figure 19-12).
Full Spine Immobilization
From a supine (lying) position and after the placement of a cervical collar, the patient is logrolled and placed onto a board or vacuum splint. Three people are required to transfer a patient onto a board. The first person is positioned at the head and applies in-line stabilization, the second is at chest level, and the third is at pelvis level. On the command of the person at the head, the patient is rolled onto his or her least-injured side. The board is then slid underneath the patient while the back is evaluated for injuries. Body straps and lateral neck stabilizers are then placed.6 Logrolling is not required with scoop stretchers, thereby minimizing spinal movement (see Figure 19-13). Full spinal immobilization can also be applied to a standing patient (see Figure 19-5). Complications of full spinal immobilization are listed in Box 19-3.
Upper-Extremity Splinting
The most common upper-extremity injury scenario is bracing from a ground-level fall. Rigid and soft splints are used to stabilize upper-extremity injuries. It is always important to leave fingertips exposed to allow continuous assessment of neurovascular status.6 Common examples of upper-extremity splints include malleable, cardboard, air, vacuum, pillow, and sling and swathe splints. Specific splinting recommendations for upper-extremity injuries are given in Table 19-1. When feasible, upper-extremity injuries are splinted in a position of function (Table 19-2).
Splint | Indication |
---|---|
Figure-8 splint | Medial clavicle fractures |
Sling and swathe splint | Shoulder and humeral injuries |
Sugar-tong splint | |
Proximal | Humeral fractures |
Distal | Wrist and distal forearm fractures |
Posterior arm splint | Stable elbow and forearm injuries |
Volar splint | Wrist fractures and fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals |
Gutter splint | Phalangeal and metacarpal fractures |
Thumb spica splint | Scaphoid fractures, thumb dislocations and fractures, and ulnar collateral ligament injuries |
Volar finger splint | Fractures of the distal phalanges and the interphalangeal joints |
Modified from Abarbanell NR: Prehospital midthigh trauma and traction splint use: Recommendations for treatment protocols, Am J Emerg Med 19:137, 2001; Boyd AS, Benjamin HJ, Asplund C: Splints and casts: Indications and methods, Am Fam Physician 80:491, 2009; Fitch MT, Nicks BA, Pariyadath M, et al: Videos in clinical medicine: Basic splinting techniques, N Engl J Med 359:e32, 2008; Garza D, Hendey G: Extremity trauma. In Mahadevan S, Garmel G: An introduction to clinical emergency medicine, Cambridge, UK, 2005, Cambridge University Press; and Chudnofsky CR, Byers SE: Splinting techniques. In Roberts J, Hedges J: Clinical procedures in emergency medicine, ed 5, Philadelphia, 2009, Saunders.
Splint | Position |
---|---|
Volar wrist splint | Neutral forearm (thumb up) with the wrist in 20 degrees of flexion |
Ulnar and radial gutter splints | Neutral forearm with the wrist in 20 degrees of extension; metacarpophalangeal joint in 50 degrees of flexion; proximal interphalangeal joint in slight flexion (e.g., 10 degrees); distal interphalangeal joint in extension |
Thumb spica splint | Forearm neutral with the wrist in 20 degrees of extension and the thumb slightly flexed to allow for thumb–index finger opposition and alignment of the thumb and the forearm |
Finger splint | Finger in slight flexion |
Sugar-tong and posterior arm splints | Elbow at 90 degrees of flexion with a neutral position of the forearm and the wrist |
Posterior leg splint | Ankle at 90 degrees |
Modified from Abarbanell NR: Prehospital midthigh trauma and traction splint use: Recommendations for treatment protocols, Am J Emerg Med 19(2):137, 2001; Boyd AS, Benjamin HJ, Asplund C: Splints and casts: Indications and methods, Am Fam Physician 80:491, 2009; Fitch MT, Nicks BA, Pariyadath M, et al: Videos in clinical medicine: Basic splinting techniques, N Engl J Med 359:e32, 2008; and Chudnofsky CR, Byers SE: Splinting techniques. In Roberts J, Hedges J: Clinical procedures in emergency medicine, ed 5, Philadelphia, 2009, WB Saunders.