Author
No of patients
TKA/THA
Mean age (range)
Fever (% patients)
Mean temperature (range)
% of POD fever
Type of workup
% of positive workup
Notes and conclusions
Shetty (2013)
52 patients
Not reported
66.03 (46–83)
25 (48.1 %)
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Comparison between Hb drop in fever and no fever groups. No differences
Vijaysegaran (2012)
141 blood cultures in 101 patients
58/41 (primary and revisions) + 2 SA
Not reported
Only patient with fever
38.5 °C (38°–39.9°)
Not reported
141 blood cultures
2 positive (1.4 %)
Only evaluation of blood cultures. Temperature alone is not an indication to perform blood cultures
Athanassious (2011)
341 patients
195/146
Not reported
31 % TKA, 36 % THA
TKA = 38.3 °C
TKA = 50 % POD 1, 37 % POD 2
In all cases of fever, UA
TKA = 11 positive UA (18.3 %), 0 positive CXR (0 %)
Fever most likely in POD 1–2, a UA and UCS may not be necessary in the immediate postoperative period. A CXR may only be necessary if multiple fever
THA = 38.3 °C
THA = 58 % POD 1, 33 % POD 2
In second fever, CXR (28 TKA, 18THA)
THA = 7 positive UA (13.4 %), 2 positive CXR (11.1 %)
Czaplicki (2011)
426 patients
214/212
64.1 (15–94)
TKA = 18 fever (8.4 %), 126 leukocytosis (57.5 %), 13 both (6.1 %)
Not reported
TKA = 9 in POD 2 (50 %)
TKA = 21 additional tests: 8 UA, 6 CXR, 2 blood cultures, 5 other tests
TKA = 6 positive tests (28.6 %), 1 joint infection (0.5 %)
Overall use of testing for fever and leukocytosis without specific physical examination findings is low and should not be performed routinely
THA = 49 fever (23.1 %), 122 leukocytosis (57.5 %), 22 both (10.4 %)
THA = 25 in POD 1 (51 %)
THA = 39 additional tests: 15 UA, 13 blood cultures, 4 CXR, 7 other tests
THA = 8 positive tests (20.5 %), 1 joint infection (0.5 %)
Ward (2010)
1,100 patients
562/664 both primary and revisions
55.4 % 51–70 years
161 patients (14.6 %)
Not reported
POD 2–3
69 patients (42.9 %) for a total of 236 diagnostic tests: 71 blood cultures, 59 UA, 49 CXR, 57 other tests
35 positive tests (14.8 %): 23.7 % UA, 5.6 % blood cultures, 2 % CXR
Positive predictor variables are fever after POD 3, multiple days of fever, T max of higher than 39 °C. In the absence of signs and symptoms indicative of pneumonia or septicemia, chest X-Ray and blood cultures are ineffective for fever evaluation
Tai (2009)
186 patients
186 TKA
Not reported
Not reported
37.9 °C
POD 1–2
Not reported
Not reported
Inverse relationship between hemoglobin loss and postoperative temperature
Anderson (2009)
102 sts of blood cultures in 50 patients
39/11 (primary and revisions)
67.3 years
All fever
Not reported
Not reported
All blood cultures
No blood culture is positive
Blood cultures are neither useful nor cost effective in evaluating fever immediately after TJA
Bindelglass (2007)
453 patients
240 TKA, 124 THA, 89 hemiarthroplasty
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Blood cultures in 40 TKA (16.6 %) and 31 THA (25 %)
2 positive blood cultures (1TKA, 1 THA)
Blood cultures are expensive and do not add relevant information
Ghosh (2006)
170 patients
All TKA
78.5 (47–88)
62/170 (36.5 %)
Not reported
18.2 % in POD1, 16.5 % POD 2
Not reported
4/62 with pyrexia (6.6 %), 14/170 (someone without pyrexia, 8.2 %)
No association between pyrexia and infection, allogenic blood transfusion, hemoglobin loss, use of urinary catheter, rheumatoid arthritis, anesthetic type, and previous pyrexia following TKR. Pyrexia in the first 5 days following TKR is usually a normal physiological response and should not cause undue concern about the presence of infection
Andres (2003)
20 patients (evaluation of the role of cytokines)
All TKA
68.3 ± 8.6
10 patients with fever compared to 10 without
Not reported
POD 1–2
Blood cultures, UA and urine culture, and a CXR in POD 2 in 10 patients (group fever)
1 positive urine culture
Significantly higher levels of drain and serum IL-6 in patients who were febrile than in patients who were afebrile at 24 and 48 h after TKA
Shaw (1999)
200 patients
100/100 (primary and revisions)
Not reported
38/200 temperature greater than 39 °C (19 %)
Not reported
POD 1
133 urine cultures (66.5 %), 17 CXR (8.5 %), 5 blood cultures (2.5 %)
11 positive urine cultures, no CXR, no blood cultures
A workup for sepsis is not indicate without signs or symptoms
Guinn et al (1999)
118 patients
All TKA (141)
Not reported
80/141 TKA (56.7 %)
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Fever following TKA was common and was not necessarily a contraindication to discharge
Kennedy (1997)
90 patients
All TKA (92)
Not reported
All T > 37 °C, 17 % > 39 °C
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
No prosthetic infection
Early postoperative pyrexia after arthroplasty is a normal physiological response, and a significant pyrexia can be predicted by a drop in hematocrit and/or after postoperative transfusion
25.5 Characteristic of an Infectious Fever
Most of the authors agree that more than 20 % of patients develop fever after joint replacement, but just in a small percentage of them, this is correlated to an infectious process. There are some fever characteristics that are correlated to a higher probability of joint, pulmonary, or urinary infections. Fever that is not associated with other pulmonary or urinary symptoms or with other joint signs of infection is rarely associated with an infectious process. One of the risk factors for septic fever is the postoperative day in which the patient develops it: it has been demonstrated that fever developing on POD 3–4–5 has a higher risk to be correlated with an infectious problem. Besides, the modality of fever is another crucial point: some authors reported that spiked fever and multiple febrile episodes are highly associated with infection (Czaplicki et al. 2011). Table 25.1 reports the papers we extracted the data from.
25.6 Role of the Workup Tests
The evaluation of fever is often expensive, invasive, and painful and disturbs patient during recovery hours (Cremeans-Smith et al. 2006), having a negative effect on it. To evaluate early postoperative fever, blood and urine cultures, white blood cell counts, chest X -ay (CXR), and urinalysis (UA) are often obtained, although there are no source of infection in the 95 % of febrile episodes. Anyway fever remains the main indication for workup in the postoperative period, both in trauma and in elective patients. In a different study that we reported, the conclusions are the same: sepsis workup is unnecessary if the febrile response progressively decreases.
25.6.1 The Role of CRP and ESR Level as Diagnostic Tool
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a phase protein synthesized by hepatocytes. Usually in healthy people, the plasma level is very low and its increase is not specific for infection.
Orthopedic surgeon sometimes uses the CRP measurement as a diagnostic tool for infection and for monitoring the effect of the treatment. Uncomplicated cardiac surgery, abdominal surgery, and uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty could induce a temporary rise in CRP (Larsson et al. 1992). Larsson et al. (1992) reported a CRP increase in all the patients examined, after an elective orthopedic surgery, and this is probably due to the tissue damage. They observed different peak levels probably correlated to the amount of tissue injured but also to the type of tissue being damaged. They also reported that the operation time, gender, age, drug history, anesthetic, and blood transfusion did not significantly influence CRP response.
Some authors (White et al. 1998) reported that CRP levels begin to increase 6 h after the trauma, with a peak level in 48–72 h, with return to normal level within 3–6 weeks in the absence of complications.
Dupont et al. (2008) reported that CRP level changes in three phases: it firstly increases up to a peak (reached at POD 2–3) of seven to 14 times the normal range. After POD 3 the level falls rapidly and then decreases more slowly until the normalization at three or four postoperative week. A CRP value of 25 mg/l at POD 21 has a 100 % specificity regardless of the location of the infection, but low sensitivity (58.3 %). Gomez-Navalon et al. (2000) reported a sensitivity of 63.3 % and a specificity of 80.1 % for CRP and judged alpha-1 antitrypsin to be more reliable, with a sensitivity of 87.5 % and a specificity of 85.8 % in detecting infections.
Okafor and Maclellan (1998) also described the trend of CRP. They reported that CRP rises till a mean value of 0.146 g/dl at POD 2 in the normal group versus 0.2 in the infected group. In the infected group, a persistent elevation on day 7 and day 21 was observed. In the same study, the authors have evaluated also the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); usually the variations were significantly different for day 0 versus POD 2 and day 0 versus POD 7, but not for day 0 versus POD 21. In the infected group, the postoperative values of ESR were significantly different from day 0 value, reflecting the persistent inflammatory state. ESR value depends on multifactorial variable, so the reliability is low and high value has to be interpreted with caution. They concluded that CRP shows less variability between patients and consequently is a better indicator of the acute phase response than ESR, which requires a series of values in order to demonstrate a trend.