Palliative Care Emergencies in Hospitalized Patients

Chapter 13
Palliative Care Emergencies in Hospitalized Patients


Paul Glare, Yvona Griffo, Alberta Alickaj, and Barbara Egan


13.1 WHAT CONSTITUTES AN EMERGENCY IN PALLIATIVE CARE?


The majority of the care of patients with chronic, incurable, life-limiting illnesses such as cancer is delivered in the ambulatory setting. Very few hospitalizations for these conditions are “elective.” Mostly, they are unscheduled admissions for symptoms caused by progression of disease, the side effects of disease-controlling therapy, an acute medical or surgical problem, or a breakdown in the system of care in the community. Sometimes, these problems are true emergencies, such as those shown in Table 13.1. Where they occur in previously healthy patients, they would require an immediate response to prevent loss of life or significant, long-lasting loss of physical or mental health. But when they occur in patients with progressive, eventually fatal illnesses, questions should arise about the kind of response that ought to be provided, and whether it is different to other patients. Sometimes, intervening is appropriate, but as patients get closer to death, the priorities can change, questioning the emergent nature of such situations [1, 2]. Determining the right kind of response is complex and gets to the heart of palliative medicine as a concept.


Table 13.1 Emergencies in Palliative Care

















































A. Medical problems we don’t want to miss (discussed in detail)
  Spinal cord compression
  Pathologic fracture
  Severe hypercalcemia
  Massive hemorrhage
  Superior vena cava syndrome or airway obstruction
  Increased intracranial pressure and coning
  Status epilepticus
  Iatrogenic drug overdoses
B. Other medical emergencies (more part of oncology or general medicine)
  Pulmonary embolus
  Obstructive nephropathy
  Cardiac tamponade
  Tumor lysis syndrome
  Febrile neutropenia
  Hyperviscosity
  Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH)
  Hypoglycemia
C. Psychosocial emergencies in the hospitalized patients with advanced disease
  Agitated delirium
  Code without a DNR order
  Suicide attempt
  Angry families

In the past, the label “palliative care patient” implied a life-threatening illness at a far advanced stage with limited further treatment options and rapidly approaching death. In this situation, prolongation of life is not a realistic aim. In that setting, emergencies are conditions which if left untreated will seriously threaten the quality of life remaining [3]. The aim of responding is to keep the patient safe, comfortable, and with their dignity intact. But nowadays, palliative care is being increasingly upstreamed and integrated with disease-controlling therapies. “Palliative care patients” may now have months or even years to live, a good performance status, and desire to have their life prolonged if possible. In this kind of a model of palliative care, treatment of a medical emergency may be no different to other patients with the same problem.


Therefore, emergency situations in patients receiving palliative care need to be managed on a case-by-case basis. Management options depend on a complex mix of variables, including the life expectancy, the level of intervention needed, and an assessment of the risks, benefits, side effects, and likely outcome. A three-step decision-making process has been suggested [3]:



  • What is the best technical solution to the problem?
  • Is this solution appropriate for this patient at this time?
  • Does the patient or health-care proxy agree?

Some of the factors influencing these decisions are listed in Table 13.2 [4]. The stage of disease and prognosis is clearly important, although an intervention should not be dismissed solely on the basis of perceived poor prognosis [3]. For example, internal fixation of a pathological fracture may be advisable for a patient with only weeks to live, as it is challenging to control pain with an unstable hip fracture. The presence of other comorbidities and symptoms and the general physical condition of the patient are also important. A key issue is distinguishing a reversible problem from a terminal event.


Table 13.2 Factors Influencing the Response to an Emergency in a Palliative Care Patient [4]


Source: Falk S, Fallon M. ABC of Palliative Care. Emergencies. BMJ 1997; 315: 1525–1528. © BMJ.






  • The stage of disease and prognosis
  • Other comorbidities and symptoms
  • The general physical condition of the patient
  • The nature of the emergency situation

    • Can it be reversed?
    • Should it be reversed?

  • The likely effectiveness and toxicity of available treatments
  • The wishes of the patient and their carers

The next issue is the nature of the emergency situation [3]. What constitutes a real emergency in palliative care? In a patient with advanced disease, it is important to differentiate between emergent symptoms, such as a pain crisis or acute breathlessness, versus an emergent medical condition such as hypercalcemia which may not be symptomatic. Emergent uncontrolled symptoms can and should always be reversed, even if terminal sedation is required. On the other hand, emergent medical conditions need not always be treated.


The likely risks, burdens, and benefits of the emergency treatment need to be considered, but is not always a simple equation. For example, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is risky and burdensome. Approximately 50% of patients who code in hospital will achieve a return of spontaneous circulation; however, only 15–20% survive to discharge. But if they do, the neurological outcome is usually good [5]. Unfortunately, those who do not survive to discharge have a poor neurological outcome and are likely to die in ICU on a mechanical ventilator. The survival rates for metastatic cancer patients are approximately half that of the general inpatient population [6].


Even if a minimally invasive, highly effective treatment is available for a medical emergency in a dying patient, should it always be reversed? For example, it may not be necessary to give hydration and bisphosphonates to a patient developing hypercalcemia in the last hours or days of life, as long as the symptoms can be managed by other means [3]. Of course, the wishes of the patient and their carers are central to all these decisions. While this is a given, problems may arise when there is a discord between the hospitalist and the patient/family regarding the burdens and benefits of treating an emergency. This may be particularly problematic for the hospitalist if the patient’s usual physician has not addressed these issues previously. The disconnect may work both ways: when the patient/family “want everything”, and when they are requesting a hastened death.


An important point to remember with medical emergencies is that many do not arise unexpectedly [3]. As with natural disasters, many medical emergencies are like hurricanes, slowly developing and able to be monitored and planned for, while others are like earthquakes, unpredictable and rapid. This meteorological analogy is especially relevant to palliative care, where discussion of the goals of care (GOC) should cover emergent situations that are both foreseen and unexpected. In fact, the Federal Emergency Management Authority (FEMA) approach to emergencies—“Prepare, Plan, and Mitigate” and “Respond and Recover”—is a useful concept that we will use as a template in this chapter (see Box 13.1). While many of the medical emergencies shown in Table 13.1 are predictable, some are the clinical equivalents of earthquakes, such as pain crises, status epilepticus, and respiratory depression from opioid toxicity.


In these situations, the FEMA principles of Respond and Rescue are applicable, although preparedness principles such as planning, organizing, training, equipping, and evaluating are still important. Because emergencies may not be easy to predict, an overall advanced care plan is important. Close monitoring of patients allows hospitalists to recognize and manage many potential complications before they become emergencies; early recognition, evaluation, and treatment of these potentially serious and at times life-threatening events are important to reduce morbidity and mortality. A useful approach is to remember to “treat the symptom, treat the problem, and treat the patient and family”:



  • Treating the symptom: A small armamentarium of appropriate medications (e.g., an opioid, a short-acting benzodiazepine, a dopamine antagonist, and an anticholinergic agent) can cover most of pain, dyspnea, and agitation emergencies that may arise at the end of life [7]. Sedation may be required. Many hospitals, including ours, now have an end-of-life order set to improve symptom control, although these are often underutilized [8].
  • Treating the problem: If possible and if medically and ethically reasonable.
  • Treating the patient and family: Palliative care deals with patients who are suffering from progressive fatal conditions, and death is the expected end. Nevertheless, even if the family is well prepared, the deterioration prior to death often appears to be an emergency to them [7]. In the care of the palliative care emergency, management not only includes ensuring the patient is comfortable but also being concerned with the needs of other patients and relatives observing the event, explaining what is happening and is being done, involving other members of the team, and communicating reassurance to the patient and the relatives as well as to other observers [7].

13.2 TRADITIONAL ONCOLOGIC EMERGENCIES IN PALLIATIVE CARE PATIENTS


13.2.1 Spinal Cord Compression


Spinal cord compression is a major cause of morbidity and suffering in cancer patients. If untreated, it may lead to unrelenting pain, paraplegia, sensory loss, and sphincter dysfunction. Early diagnosis is crucial, as the implementation of treatment before neural injury occurs may allow most patients to maintain neurological function. Compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina compression by a metastatic lesion outside the spinal dura is the most common and is the focus here.


Prepare. Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is common, occurring in approximately 5% of patients with advanced cancer. In adults, the most common cancers associated with MESCC are prostate, breast, and lung cancer, followed by non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and kidney cancer. It may also be seen in colorectal cancer, sarcomas, and unknown primaries. Although most cases of MESCC develop in patients with known cancer, about 20% of cases are the initial manifestation. The most common site of MESCC is the thoracic spine (60–70%) followed by lumbosacral (30%) and cervical (10%). The major presenting clinical signs and symptoms are pain (90–95%), which can be mechanical bone pain or radicular pain which indicates spinal instability. Motor weakness (60–85%), sensory loss, and bowel and bladder dysfunction (50%) are usually late symptoms. Bisphosphonates or denosumab may reduce skeletal-related events including MESCC [9] and should be administered months before to prevent these complications in vulnerable patients.


Plan. If the patient’s prognosis is more than 3–6 months, a full workup and aggressive treatment of MESCC may be appropriate. Selecting the appropriate therapeutic modality is very important and should be done in consultation with a multidisciplinary team including some or all of the following: neurology, neurosurgery or orthopedics, radiation oncology, medical oncology, interventional radiology, anesthesiology, and PMR. In patients with a poor outlook, the plan should be to provide pain relief, excellent nursing care (continued in an SNF or inpatient hospice unit after discharge from hospital), and mobility aids such as a wheelchair.


Mitigate. In patients presenting with escalating back pain, it is very important to identify an impending MESCC before the appearance of neurologic symptoms or signs, in order to improve the clinical outcome. Back pain that is new, progressive, or changing its pattern should raise concern for MESCC, especially if it is worse on recumbency, has a radicular component, is situated in the thoracic region, or is associated with spinal tenderness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the total spine, with and without contrast, is the diagnostic procedure of choice. Computed tomography (CT) myelography is indicated in patients who can’t have an MRI, for example, with spinal hardware, and does have an advantage in that it permits collection of spinal fluid for cytology and evaluation.


Aggressive supportive care in patients with suspected MESCC is extremely important. Cord compression may present as a pain crisis [10]. Emergency pain control management prior to imaging is necessary to prevent movement artifact and to complete the diagnostic examination. Strategies for managing a pain crisis can be found in Chapter 2 of this book. High-dose corticosteroids, with initial intravenous bolus of dexamethasone dose ranging from 10 to 100 mg, followed by divided q 6 h dosages ranging from 16 to 96 mg daily should also be given when MESCC is suspected [11] and may produce significant clinical improvement even before definitive treatment starts.


Respond. Once an MESCC is confirmed, the choice of the treatment depends on a number of factors including the patient’s performance status and overall fitness, the presence or absence of significant spinal fluid flow block and bony vertebral lesions, the degree of spine instability, the primary tumor, the extent of the disease and metastases, and the presence of other complications or medical comorbidities [12]. If the MRI shows epidural disease without significant spinal block, urgent radiation therapy is the treatment of choice, as this provides highly effective palliation for bone pain and will prevent progression in most cases [13]. Highly radiosensitive tumors include lymphoma, myeloma, Ewing sarcoma, seminoma, and neuroblastoma; breast and prostate are less radiosensitive; kidney, colon, lung, and melanoma are relatively radioresistant. There is no general optimal dose and fractionation regimen for MESCC; often 30 Gy in 10 fractions is chosen. Results should start to be seen within a few days of starting radiotherapy. The high-dose corticosteroid therapy should be continued during treatment.


If the MRI shows significant spinal block with cord compression and spinal instability, and the patient is a surgical candidate, lesion-directed surgery and spine stabilization should be considered. Spinal instability is a potential cause of spinal cord damage in addition to the epidural mass and is not affected by radiation therapy. If the patient has a spinal block but is not a surgical candidate, emergency radiation therapy or spinal stereotactic radiosurgery is an option. Chemotherapy is a reasonable treatment option for MESCC when the underlying tumor is chemosensitive. It has been used for both Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, breast cancer, germ cell tumors, and neuroblastoma. Hormonal manipulation has also been used in hormone-naïve patient with MESCC from breast and prostate cancer following radiotherapy.


If comfort care is the goal and the patient is unable to undergo emergency radiation treatment or surgery, then corticosteroids and opioids via IV-PCA will be most effective for pain control. In patients with limited life expectancy, regional anesthesia with a continuous epidural spinal catheter or intrathecal pump may be an option.


Recover. If surgery is performed for metastatic MESCC, it is followed by radiation therapy. Several weeks of rehabilitation will also be required following treatment. The outcome depends mainly on two things—the type of cancer and how well it responds to treatment. Treatment of MESCC usually relieves pain, leg weakness, and loss of bladder or bowel control. Radiotherapy controls spinal pain in over 70% of cases [13]. When patients with only minor problems in walking start treatment, they are likely to recover their walking completely. In patients who were unable to walk at the time of surgery or initiating XRT, only 10–20% are likely to regain full mobility [14].


13.2.2 Elevated Intracranial Pressure


Elevated intracranial pressure (EICP) is another potentially devastating neurological complication of cancer, and can occur with both primary brain tumor and cerebral metastases. Intracranial pressure is normally ≤15 mm Hg in adults, and pathologic intracranial hypertension is present at pressures ≥20 mm Hg. Like MESCC, EICP may also present emergently, although this is a much rarer problem than MESCC even in a cancer center. Successful management of patients with EICP requires prompt recognition, therapy directed at both reducing EICP and reversing its underlying cause, and the judicious use of invasive monitoring.


Prepare. Brain metastases are more common cause of EICP than primary brain tumors. The incidence of brain metastases varies by primary tumor site: lung 50%, breast 15–20%, melanoma 10%, and less common with kidney, colorectal, lymphoma, and unknown primary. EICP is caused by vasogenic peritumoral edema and bleeding within necrotic tumor. The symptoms of EICP include headaches, cognitive dysfunction, focal weakness, and seizures, caused by cerebral edema disrupting synaptic transmission and altering neuronal excitability. Unchecked, EICP may result in brain herniation.


Plan. Clinical findings that suggest the need for urgent intervention include worsening headache, vomiting, altered mental status, increasing lethargy and the onset of stupor, unstable vital signs, focal signs such as fixed and dilated pupil(s), or decorticate or decerebrate posturing. Cushing’s triad of bradycardia, respiratory depression, and hypertension is an ominous finding, indicative of brainstem compression occurring. As with MESCC, the choice of the treatment of malignant EICP depends on a number of factors including: the patient’s performance status and overall fitness, the primary tumor, the extent of the disease and metastases, and the presence of other complications or medical comorbidities. If urgent aggressive intervention is indicated, optimal care requires collaboration between the hospitalist, intensivist, and the neurosurgeon. Brain metastases generally have a poor prognosis so treatment may not be warranted. In patients where the GOC is to allow a natural death, comfort care is the goal and it is reassuring that death from EICP is usually peaceful.


Mitigate. The best therapy for EICP is resection of the tumor. While a decision is being made to pursue this, reduction of intracranial pressure should be begun, and reduction of intracranial pressure and improvement in neurologic symptoms usually begins within hours of commencing glucocorticoids [15]. In patients with severe symptoms, the usual dexamethasone regimen consists of a 10 mg loading dose, followed by 4 mg 4 times/day or 8 mg twice daily. There is some evidence that lower doses (1–2 mg 4 times/day) may be as effective and less toxic in patients without impending herniation. Dexamethasone should be stopped in 72–96 h if there is no response. The role of steroids in patients with EICP for comfort care is more controversial. Steroids may have a role if the patient is very symptomatic, but run the risk of unnecessarily prolonging suffering. Opioids may be prescribed if there are bothersome headaches.


Respond. The emergent response to EICP when aggressive treatment is indicated includes resuscitation and reduction of the volume of the intracranial contents. Establishing a secure airway and close attention to blood pressure allow the clinician to identify and treat apnea and hypotension quickly. Standard resuscitation techniques should be instituted as soon as possible, including head elevation, and hyperventilation. In addition to steroids, critically ill patients with unstable vital signs should be given osmotic diuretics such as mannitol (1–1.5 g/kg IV). If appropriate, ventriculostomy is a rapid means of simultaneously diagnosing and treating elevated ICP.


Recover. Patients undergoing aggressive management with neurosurgery ± stereotactic radiosurgery may then go on to have whole brain XRT and/or chemotherapy. Inpatient rehabilitation may then be required for patients with a neurologic deficit. Where a more conservative approach to management has been chosen, keeping the patient sedated decreases ICP by reducing metabolic demand. Fever should be aggressively treated with Tylenol and mechanical cooling, as fever increases brain metabolism thereby increasing and aggravating EICP by increasing the volume of blood in the cranial vault. Seizures can both complicate and contribute to elevated ICP. Anticonvulsant therapy should be instituted if seizures are suspected; there are no randomized trials that have established the superiority of one agent over others. Prophylactic anticonvulsant treatment is generally not recommended for patients with a primary or metastatic brain tumor and without a history of antecedent seizure [16], but may be warranted in some cases which include high-risk mass lesions, such as those within supratentorial cortical locations or lesions adjacent to the cortex.


13.2.3 Status Epilepticus


Status epilepticus (SE), defined as continuous generalized tonic-clonic seizures lasting beyond 5 min without full recovery between seizures, is a life-threatening event and a neurologic emergency. Untreated, it causes multiple metabolic derangements which can produce permanent brain damage if prompt and vigorous treatment is not provided. Other medical complications of SE include aspiration, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, hepatic failure, and intracranial hypertension. Immediate treatment with appropriate doses of medications is also critical since uncontrolled SE can become refractory and very difficult to control.


Prepare. Any type of seizure can evolve into SE. In adult palliative care patients, the main causes of SE are brain tumors (primary or metastatic), metabolic derangements (hypoglycemia and electrolyte imbalance), as well as hypoxia, low antiepileptic drug levels, acute cerebrovascular accidents, meningitis, encephalitis, and cerebral abscess. Other causes include global hypoxic–ischemic insult, drug and alcohol abuse or withdrawal, and head trauma. Stroke accounts for almost 50% of acute symptomatic causes of SE in adults and elderly. Primary or metastatic CNS tumors are commonly associated with epilepsy, and seizure is the first presenting symptom in 30–90% of cases. Generalized seizures may occur with a large mass producing increased intracranial pressure.


Plan. In settings where SE is common, such as in the Emergency Room or on the Neurology floor of a cancer center, there should be an algorithm for managing SE that staff members are trained in. If SE is diagnosed or suspected, an emergent neurology consult should be called and an interdisciplinary team including anesthesiology or ICU should be involved, to prepare for intubation and transfer to a neuromonitoring unit.


Mitigate. The diagnosis of generalized tonic-clonic SE is not difficult, and should be easy to differentiate from other conditions. Nonconvulsive (absence) SE may be harder to diagnose and is characterized by stupor, a confused state of altered consciousness and little or no motor activity. It is important to differentiate nonconvulsive SE from pseudostatus or drug-induced coma. Pseudostatus and drug-induced coma lack the typical pattern of EEG activity and evolution seen with SE. A controversial issue is whether all patients with brain metastases should be given anticonvulsants. Patients who present with seizures require anticonvulsants; however, prophylactic anticonvulsants did not protect against subsequent seizures. Furthermore, antiepileptics stimulate the cytochrome P450 enzyme, enhancing the metabolism of some chemotherapy agents, rendering them less effective. Anticonvulsants also enhance metabolism of corticosteroids, thus reducing control of cerebral edema. They also frequently cause drug interactions associated with life-threatening side effects such as Stevens–Johnson syndrome. Therefore, prophylactic anticonvulsants are not recommended for patients with underlying brain metastases or other structural brain lesions. Patients with brain metastases from melanoma may be an exception to the general recommendation against prophylactic anticonvulsants, given their higher prevalence of seizures.


Respond. Treatment should be begun immediately when diagnosing SE. Maintain airway, breathing, and circulation, obtain finger stick to assess for hypoglycemia, and give benzodiazepines. Maintain Airway patency by positioning patient’s head (backward head tilt with chin lifted up), Breathing by giving supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula or mask and Circulation by fluid support. Minimize injury by moving the patient to a safe environment to prevent falls or head injury. Obtain IV access and draw blood samples for serum chemistry, glucose level, hematology studies, toxicology screen and antiepileptic drug levels. Begin continuous vital signs and ECG monitoring. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer (MSKCC) algorithm for managing SE is shown in Box 13.2.

Aug 14, 2016 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Palliative Care Emergencies in Hospitalized Patients

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access