Occupational Health
The health care industry has the dubious distinction of being one of the most hazardous places to work in the United States (health care is second only to manufacturing in the number of occupational illnesses and injuries sustained by their workers (Katz JD, Holzman RS. Occupational health. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Ortega R, Stock MC, eds. Clinical Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013: 61–89).
I. Physical Hazards
Anesthetic Gases
Concerns about the possible toxic effects of occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics have been expressed since their introduction into clinical practice.
Several studies testing for chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, or changes in peripheral lymphocytes have found no evidence of cellular damage among clinicians exposed to the levels of anesthetic gases that are encountered in an adequately ventilated operating room (OR).
Nitrous oxide exposure is a special situation as this gas can irreversibly oxidize the cobalt atom of vitamin B12 to an inactive state. This inhibits methionine synthetase and prevents the conversion of methyltetrahydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate, which is required for DNA synthesis, assembly of the myelin sheath, and methyl substitutions in neurotransmitters. At adequate clinically used concentrations of nitrous oxide, this inhibition could result in anemia and polyneuropathy. As with the halogenated hydrocarbon anesthetics, these effects with nitrous oxide have not been demonstrated in adequately scavenged ORs with effective waste gas scavenging.
Reproductive Outcomes
There is no increased risk of spontaneous abortion in studies of personnel who work in scavenged environments where waste gases were scavenged.
It is likely that other job-associated conditions (e.g., stress, infections, long work hours, shift work, radiation exposure)
besides exposure to trace anesthetic gases may account for many of the adverse reproductive outcomes reported among some health care workers (HCWs).
The evidence taken as a whole suggests that there is a slight increase in the relative risk of spontaneous abortion and congenital abnormalities in offspring of female health care professionals working in ORs. This risk is minimized when appropriate waste gas scavenging technology is applied.
Cancer. There was no difference between anesthesiologists and a cohort (internists) in the overall risk of mortality from cancer.
Behavioral Effects
One of the principal reasons identified by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) for limiting occupational exposure to waste anesthetic gases is to prevent “decrements in performance, cognition, audiovisual ability, and dexterity.”
Most of the measurable psychomotor and cognitive impairments (lethargy, fatigue) produced by brief exposures are short lived and disappear within 5 minutes of cessation of exposure.
Levels of Trace Anesthetic Gases
Appropriate scavenging equipment and with adequate air exchange in the OR, levels of waste anesthetic gases could be significantly reduced.
Minimal levels of anesthetic gases can be obtained in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) by ensuring adequate room ventilation and fresh gas exchange and by discontinuing the anesthetic gases in sufficient time before leaving the OR.
Recommendations of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
In 1977, NIOSH issued a criteria document that included recommended exposure limits (RELs) for waste anesthetic gases of 2 parts-per-million (ppm) (1-hour ceiling) for halogenated anesthetic agents when used alone or 0.5 ppm for halogenated agent and 25 ppm of nitrous oxide when used together (time-weighted average during the period of anesthetic administration).
NIOSH has not yet developed RELs for the agents most commonly used in current practice (isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane). These volatile agents have potencies, chemical characteristics, and rates and products of metabolism that differ significantly from older anesthetics.
However, most states have instituted regulations calling for routine measurement of ambient gases in ORs and have mandated that levels not exceed an arbitrary maximum.
It is prudent to institute measures that reduce waste anesthetic levels in the OR environment to as low as possible. To ensure reduced occupational exposure, departmental programs facilities where anesthetics are administered should have procedures to monitor for detection of leaks in the anesthesia machines and contamination as a result of faulty anesthetic techniques (e.g., poor mask fit, or leaks around the cuffs of endotracheal tubes cuffs and laryngeal mask airways, and scavenging system malfunctions; Table 3-1).
When there have been leaks of anesthetic gases, dispersion and removal of the pollutants depends on adequate room ventilation, at least 15 to 21 air exchanges per hour with three bringing in outside air.
Through the use of scavenging equipment, equipment maintenance procedures, appropriate anesthetic work practices, and efficient OR ventilation systems, the environmental anesthetic concentration can be reduced to minimal levels.
Table 3-1 Sources of Operating Room Contamination
Anesthetic Techniques
Failure to turn off gases at end of an anesthetic
Turning on gas flow before placing mask on patient
Poorly fitting mask (especially during induction)
Flushing the circuit
Filling vaporizers
Uncuffed (pediatric) or leaking tracheal tubes
Poorly fitting laryngeal airways
Side stream sampling carbon dioxide and anesthetic gas analyzers
Anesthetic Machine Delivery System and Scavenging Systems
Open/closed systems
Occlusion or malfunction of hospital system
Maladjustment of hospital disposal vacuum system
Leaks (high-pressure hoses or connectors, nitrous oxide tank mounting, O rings, carbon dioxide absorbent canisters, low-pressure circuit)
Other Sources
Cryosurgery units
Cardiopulmonary bypass circuits
Chemicals
Known cardiovascular complications of methyl methacrylate in surgical patients include hypotension, bradycardia, and cardiac arrest.
Reported risks from repeated occupational exposure to methyl methacrylate include skin irritation and burns, allergic reactions and asthma, eye irritation including possible corneal ulceration, headache, and neurologic signs.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recommends use of scavenging devices in order to maintain an 8-hour, time-weighted average exposure to methyl methacrylate of 100 ppm.
Allergic reactions to volatile anesthetic agents and to some muscle relaxants have been associated with contact dermatitis, hepatitis, and anaphylaxis in individual anesthesiologists (does not appear to cause anesthetic-induced hepatitis).
Latex in surgical and examination gloves has become a common source of allergic reactions among OR personnel. In many cases, HCWs who are allergic to latex experience their first adverse reactions while they are patients undergoing surgery. The prevalence of latex sensitivity among anesthesiologists is approximately 12%.
The protein content is responsible for most of the generalized allergic reactions to latex-containing surgical gloves. These reactions are exacerbated by the presence of powder that enhances the potential of latex particles to aerosolize and to spread to the respiratory systems of personnel and to environmental surfaces during the donning or removal of gloves (Table 3-2).
Radiation
Anesthesia personnel are at risk of exposure from both direct (primary x-ray beam, leakage for other sites with x-ray equipment) and indirect (scattered radiation from reflected surfaces) sources of ionizing radiation.
Effects of radiation that result in DNA injury may result in the development of cancer. There is no known threshold below which the risk of developing cancer completely disappears, and there can be a long latency period before the clinical presentation of an induced neoplasm.
Recent studies, conducted subsequent to the increased utilization of ionizing radiation in ORs, cardiac catheterization laboratories and other interventional radiology suites have revealed a worrisome trend towards increased exposure among anesthesia personnel (although still well below OSHA limits [5 Rems]).
Table 3-2 Types of Reactions to Latex Gloves
Reaction
Signs and Symptoms
Cause
Management
Irritant contact dermatitis
Scaling, dry cracking of skin
Direct skin irritation by gloves, powder, soaps
Identify reaction, avoid irritant, possible use of glove liner, use of alternative product
Type IV: delayed hypersensitivity
Itching, blistering, crusting (delayed 6–72 hours)
Chemical additives used in manufacturing Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access