Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Consciousness



Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Consciousness





The introduction of general anesthetics into clinical practice more than 150 years ago stands as one of the seminal innovations of medicine. It facilitated the development of modern surgery and spawned the specialty of anesthesiology (Crowder CM, Palanca BJ, Evers AS. Mechanisms of anesthesia and consciousness. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Ortega R, Stock MC, eds. Clinical Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013: 105–129). Despite the importance of general anesthetics and more than 100 years of active research, the molecular mechanisms responsible for anesthetic action remain one of the unsolved mysteries of science (Table 5-1).


I. What is Anesthesia?

A practical description of the anesthetic state is a collection of “component” changes in behavior or perception (components of the anesthetic state include unconsciousness, amnesia, analgesia, immobility, and attenuation of autonomic responses to noxious stimulation). Regardless of which definition of anesthesia is used, rapid and reversible drug-induced changes in behavior or perception are essential to anesthesia. As such, anesthesia can only be defined and measured in an intact organism.



  • It has long been assumed that anesthesia is a state that is achieved when an anesthetic agent reaches a specific concentration at its effect site in the brain and that if tolerance to the anesthetic develops, increasing concentrations of anesthetic might be required to maintain a constant level of anesthesia during prolonged anesthetic administration.


  • The recent finding that it takes a higher anesthetic brain concentration to induce anesthesia than to maintain anesthesia
    (emergence occurs at a significantly lower concentration than induction) contradicts these assumptions. This phenomenon is referred to as neural inertia and suggests that the mechanisms of anesthetic induction and emergence may be different.








Table 5-1 Why Are Mechanisms of Anesthesia so Difficult to Elucidate?




Difficult to link anesthetic effects observed in vitro to intact animals
No structure–activity relationships are apparent
Wide variety of structurally unrelated compounds (steroids to xenon) are capable of producing anesthesia
Suggests multiple molecular mechanisms can produce anesthesia
Anesthetics work at very high concentrations (contrasts with drugs, hormones, and neurotransmitters that bind at specific receptors)
If anesthetics act at receptors, must bind with low affinity and for short periods (difficult to observe and characterize)


II. How is Anesthesia Measured?

Quantitative measurements of anesthetic potency are essential to study the pharmacology of anesthetic action. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) is defined as the alveolar partial pressure of a gas at which 50% of humans do not respond to a surgical incision.



  • The use of MAC as a measure of anesthetic potency has the advantages that it is an extremely reproducible measurement that is remarkably constant over a wide range of species, and the use of the end-tidal gas concentration provides an index of the “free” concentration of drug required to produce anesthesia because the end-tidal gas concentration is in equilibrium with the free concentration in plasma.


  • The MAC concept has several important limitations, particularly when trying to relate MAC values to anesthetic potency observed in vitro (Table 5-2).


  • Monitors that measure some correlate of anesthetic depth have been introduced into clinical practice.



    • The most popular of these monitors converts spontaneous electroencephalogram waveforms into a single value that correlates with anesthetic depth for some general anesthetics.


    • To date, these monitors have not been shown to be more effective at preventing awareness during anesthesia than
      simply maintaining an adequate end-tidal anesthetic concentration.








Table 5-2 Limitations of the Minimum Alveolar Concentration (Mac) Concept




End point in a MAC determination is quantal (a subject is either anesthetized or unanesthetized)
Difficult to compare MAC measurements to concentration–response curves obtained in vitro
MAC represents the average response of a whole population of subjects rather than the response of a single subject
MAC measurements can only be directly applied to anesthetic gases
MAC equivalent for parenteral anesthetics (barbiturates, neurosteroids, propofol) is the free concentration of the drug in the plasma necessary to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of subjects
MAC is highly dependent on the anesthetic end point used to define it (verbal command vs. noxious stimulus)


III. What is the Chemical Nature of Anesthetic Target Sites?



  • The Meyer-Overton Rule (Fig. 5-1)



    • Because a wide variety of structurally unrelated compounds obey the Meyer-Overton rule, it has been reasoned that all anesthetics are likely to act at the same molecular site (referred to as the unitary theory of anesthesia).


    • Because solubility in a specific solvent strongly correlates with anesthetic potency, the anesthetic target site was assumed to be hydrophobic in nature.


    • The octanol–water partition coefficient best correlates with anesthetic potency, suggesting that the anesthetic site is likely to be amphipathic, having both polar and nonpolar characteristics.


  • Exceptions to the Meyer-Overton Rule

Jun 16, 2016 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Consciousness

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access