SURGICAL ANALGESICS: SPINAL CORD STIMULATION, INTRATHECAL PUMPS, AND CORTICAL STIMULATION
SURGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Description: Chronic pain arises from a variety of etiologies. It can involve both neuropathic and nociceptive processes and occur in a variety of anatomical distributions (e.g., radicular versus a hemibody pattern). Therapeutic interventions are dictated by the pathophysiology of the pain, its qualitative nature, etiology, and the patient’s prognosis. Many common procedures for chronic pain are directed at the spinal cord and may consist of epidural or intrathecal medications or electrical stimulation.
For chronic spinal cord stimulation (e.g., postlaminectomy syndrome) an epidural electrode is implanted either percutaneously or via an open laminectomy. Percutaneous electrodes are easier to implant and have less associated surgical pain. The surgical electrode (implanted via laminectomy) confers greater mechanical stability in the epidural space. In addition, given its larger contact size, it can generate higher current densities with less drain on the implanted system. For percutaneous electrodes, a small skin incision is made two to three vertebral levels caudal to the target region of the spinal cord. For “surgical paddle” electrodes, the skin incision is made one to two levels caudal to the target zone of the spinal cord, and a laminectomy is performed to provide access to the epidural space. Incisions are closed in the standard fashion.
Most percutaneous electrode placements and some paddle electrode placements are done awake so that intraoperative test stimulation can be performed. The procedures are done in the prone or lateral position with consequent implications for airway management in the sedated patient. Localization of the electrodes is accomplished initially based on radiographic criteria; however, these localizations are only approximate, and it is recommended that the electrode placement be confirmed by intraop stimulation. The patient needs to be sufficiently alert to communicate the quality, distribution, and intensity of the stimulation-induced paresthesias. Surgical paddle placement requires a variable extent of muscle dissection and laminectomy, which may be done under general anesthesia or with epidural anesthesia for patient comfort. If done under general anesthesia, response to paddle test stimulation may be measured by manual palpation of musculature stimulated at higher test voltage, and/or using intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring. To assess efficacy, the electrode may be externalized and percutaneous stimulation used for assessment. If there is ≥ 50% reduction in pain, the patient may return to the OR for internalization of the implantable pulse generator (IPG). Postop, these patients can have an exacerbation of pain, particularly if neuropathic in nature. They may require iv lidocaine or ketamine infusions to return them to their preop baseline, even with a functioning and appropriately located stimulating electrode.
For pain of central origin (e.g., poststroke, multiple sclerosis, and trigeminal nerve pathology), surgical procedures are often directed at the thalamus and cortex. Thalamic interventions include stereotactic insertion of stimulating electrodes into sensory thalamus. Thalamic DBS requires awake mapping of the somatotopic representation of the affected body part through either microelectrode mapping or stimulation-induced paresthesias. For medically intractable neuropathic pain syndromes, epidural motor cortex stimulation has shown mixed results. Functional mapping of the motor cortex for epidural stimulation can be done with anatomical and physiological mapping under GA via a craniotomy, with the anesthetic tailored to minimize interference with EP recording. The incision consists of a 5-10 cm linear or 5 × 10 cm trapezoidal incision placed over and paralleling the motor cortex.
Identification of the appropriate location on the motor strip can be done initially with epidural mapping using SSEPs elicited from the part of the body where the pain originates. In cases of denervation syndromes, SSEP may not be present, and the minimum intensity point for epidural stimulation-induced movements is used. In rare cases, the surgeon may elect to perform the surgery awake to facilitate mapping. To assess efficacy, the electrode may be externalized and percutaneous stimulation assessed for overall therapeutic efficacy. If there is ≥ 50% reduction in pain, the patient will return to the OR for internalization of the IPG. Closure consists of calvarial reconstruction with externalization of leads. The craniotomy incision is closed in the standard fashion. If a percutaneous trial is done, the IPG implant requires a second GETA with reopening of wounds.
The mainstay of surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia is
microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve in the prepontine cistern (see
p. 44). In patients who are poor surgical candidates, treatment is accomplished with ablative procedures aimed at the gasserian ganglia, using chemolytic, mechanical, or RF techniques. Patients who fail gasserian ganglion interventions or have atypical facial pain may be candidates for
thalamic DBS or
motor cortex stimulation. Stereotactic radiosurgical techniques are increasingly utilized as an ablative treatment for trigeminal neuralgia, particularly in the elderly (> 65 yr old) population or in other surgically averse candidates. Radiosurgery employs highly focused beams of radiation to partially ablate the intracisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve while sparing surrounding structures (brain stem and other cranial nerves). The downside to radiosurgery is that the effects and consequent pain relief may take weeks to months to manifest, as opposed to other surgical and ablative treatments whose effects are immediate.
For pain unresponsive to spinal cord stimulation or because of unacceptable side effects of parental medications, continuous intrathecal administration of analgesics can be accomplished with an implantable medication delivery system. An incision is made over the L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 spinous process and a second incision is placed in the RLQ of the abdomen. An intrathecal catheter is then placed and anchored to the lumbodorsal fascia. A tunneling tool is used to bring the catheter from the lumbar spinal region to the abdomen. This tunneling procedure is rarely tolerated without GETA or deep sedation. A reservoir or continuous-delivery pump is then placed in the abdomen and attached to the catheter. Both incisions are closed in two layers.
Intrathecal narcotics (typically morphine) can produce satisfactory results because therapeutic drug concentrations can be achieved at the level of spinal opiate receptors without influencing higher CNS opiate systems. This therapeutic intervention can be assessed through a percutaneous catheter trial. Patients who experience ≥ 50% reduction in pain are candidates for a totally implanted pump system. These are low-morbidity procedures (5-10%) with infections and hardware failures constituting the greatest problems. Abrupt cessation of medications—through either patient noncompliance with refill schedules (10-12 wk) or hardware failure—however, can lead to a serious withdrawal syndrome.
Usual preop diagnosis: Chronic pain