Fellowship Training in Simulation


Problem identification and general needs assessment

Needs assessment of targeted learners

Goals and objectives

Educational strategies

Implementation

Evaluation and feedback





Problem Identification and General Needs Assessment


Early general and specialty medical education fellowships were developed to augment teaching skills, create communities of educators, and develop educational leaders at a time of growing interest in medical education scholarship [2]. Similarly, health services research fellowships, sponsored by groups like the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, also offered academic, methodologic, and leadership training in order to help selected clinicians better understand nonmedical disciplines essential to health care. Today, the rapidly increasing interest in simulation [7, 8] has driven a new demand for specialty leaders. These individuals need the training to lead, develop, teach, and evaluate the kind of simulation-based initiatives which promise wide-ranging impact on health care quality and safety. While medical students and residents interested in staying in academia increasingly view simulation as a viable career pathway, they need a support infrastructure to develop and sustain education-based careers. Fellowship work can help trainees efficiently acquire needed skills by providing an intensive period of time, focus, and support.


Needs Assessment of Targeted Learners


Most current simulation fellowships are focused on physician trainees who have just completed residency training. These individuals are more likely to have experienced simulation in their prior training but typically have limited training in the theory, style, administration, and science of simulation-based education. Potential fellows can identify a range of focus areas during a simulation fellowship, including clinical teaching, medical education research, leadership and administration, and biomechanical engineering. Some institutions have chosen to combine medical education and simulation fellowships into a unified whole, complementing those shared competencies (i.e., teaching methodology, competency assessment, curriculum development, program evaluation, organizational structure, and educational scholarship) with more simulation-specific skills like technology-enhanced case development, scenario implementation, and debriefing strategies.


Goals and Objectives


The primary goal of simulation fellowship programs is to create experts and leaders in the field of healthcare simulation by providing dedicated experience and mentored training in simulation-based medical education. A sample list of objectives is listed in Table 42.2.


Table 42.2
Potential objectives for simulation fellowship















By the end of the simulation fellowship, all fellows should have the skills to:

1. Describe historical and current theoretical and scientific foundations of simulation-based medical education

2. Conceive, develop, and run simulation-based training and assessment modules

3. Help create, administer, and evaluate new simulation programs, centers, and technology

4. Critically appraise and/or conduct simulation-based medical education research

Other objectives are at the discretion of the fellowship director and fellow, such as those focusing on specific projects tailored to the fellows’ goals and the local environment. Fellowship program objectives should adapt with changing institutional or fellow needs.


Educational Strategies


The strategies employed for any fellowship should reflect the local environment in terms of objectives, resources, and faculty. It is more efficient to make use of existing courses and infrastructure, such as master’s degree coursework or certificate programs, and established faculty development workshops. It is helpful if the simulation fellows can join an existing cohort of research and education trainees in other disciplines to learn from one another, share research ideas, and participate in collective “works-in-progress” presentation and feedback sessions.

Educational strategies should map to the objectives of the program. The sample objectives from Table 42.2 are recounted below with example strategies matched to each item:

1.

Describe the historical and current theoretical and scientific foundations of simulationbased medical education:



  • Attend local faculty lectures and participate in community discussion.


  • Engage in guided readings and/or journal club.


  • Attend regional and national simulation/medical education meetings/exhibits.


  • Participate in graduate-level coursework and continuing education offerings.

 

2.

Conceive, develop, and run simulationbased training and assessment modules (in addition to the above):



  • Engage in a longitudinal teaching practicum (supervised practical teaching experience).


  • Learn and practice how to operate and teach with all simulation equipment.


  • Observe both novice and master simulation instructors.


  • Encourage direct observation of one’s own instruction and solicit peer feedback.


  • Assume leadership in selected course design, administration, and evaluation.


  • Participate in reflective practice

 

3.

Help create, administer, and evaluate new simulation programs, centers, and technology (in addition to the above):



  • Attend local simulation operations, planning, and leadership meetings.


  • Attend faculty development and leadership workshops (locally and nationally).


  • Assume leadership for a programmatic component of the local teaching unit.


  • Assist in evaluation of new equipment and financing.


  • Participate in the hiring and human resources process for new fellows and staff.

 

4.

Critically appraise and/or conduct simulationbased medical education research (in addition to the above):



  • Completion of an IRB/Human subjects review application.


  • Write and submit scholarly abstract(s) for peer review and presentation.


  • Design, implement, and complete a scholarly project through to manuscript.


  • Participate in peer review of others’ work (formal or informal).

 


Implementation


The implementation of a fellowship program will be driven by the local environment and resources. This section will be a general discussion of simulation fellowship program implementation, with framework adapted from Kern’s curricular development model [6], including a discussion of resources, support, administration, barriers, and introduction of the curriculum.

While not required for the academic training component of the fellowship, clinicians need a venue to maintain their clinical skill during the fellowship period. This clinical component complements the simulation fellowship work and is typically arranged in collaboration with the relevant clinical department of the base institution. However, some fellows may arrange clinical work independently, as long as it fits within the structure and time demands of the fellowship curriculum. Under special arrangement, some fellows, particularly international research physicians, will be eligible only for nonclinical fellowship experience.


Identification of Resources


Resources required for any fellowship program revolve around discussion of applicants, faculty, time, facilities, and funding considerations.


Fellow Applicants


Fellowship training in medical simulation is applicable across specialties, but a broad clinical background is helpful in serving the diverse constituencies of most simulation programs. Selection criteria and clinical responsibilities will vary by institution. Those programs that facilitate clinical placement will interview and select applicants for both clinical and fellowship work.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

May 30, 2017 | Posted by in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Fellowship Training in Simulation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access