Chapter 86 Disorders and Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Liver
Gastrointestinal Evaluation of the Critically Ill Child
Abdominal Examination
The abdominal examination, which can be difficult to perform on young children without life-threatening illness, is made more difficult in the ICU setting. Pain and fear limit cooperation. Patients who are obtunded by narcotics, sedatives, or an underlying central nervous system (CNS) disorder display inconsistent responses to abdominal palpation. Neuromuscular blockade abolishes abdominal guarding. Children with multisystem trauma may not localize pain. These impediments notwithstanding, the observant clinician can glean a great deal of information from a carefully performed examination. Simple inspection of the child’s abdomen can reveal generalized distention; abnormally prominent abdominal wall veins (which signify portal hypertension); or anterior and lateral abdominal wall ecchymoses, such as Cullen’s sign or Grey Turner’s sign (which herald acute pancreatitis). In addition, because of the child’s relatively undeveloped abdominal musculature, visceromegaly or abdominal masses may be apparent on inspection.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
The development of flexible fiberoptic endoscopes appropriately sized for use in infants and children has greatly expanded the value of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating a variety of gastroenterologic disorders in critically ill pediatric patients. For example, pediatric endoscopes with an outside diameter of 5 mm can now be used for diagnostic purposes in newborn infants. Electrocautery, injection therapy, or variceal banding of gastrointestinal bleeding sites can also be performed with devices that now fit within the biopsy channels of a standard 9.4-mm pediatric endoscope. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD]) is performed most often with the child under deep sedation or general anesthesia, although some clinicians report successful unsedated upper endoscopy in very young infants. Many pediatric endoscopists in North America use a combination of narcotic sedative and benzodiazepine to achieve acceptable sedation analgesia.1 Other agents commonly used for sedation are propofol and ketamine. General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation is appropriate when the side effects of sedation or the endoscopy pose an undue risk of respiratory compromise (e.g., when underlying pulmonary disease, upper airway disease, or disorders of respiratory control are present) or if the patient is at risk for aspiration of gastric contents (e.g., when massive upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage is present or when an emergency foreign body extraction is performed on a child with a full stomach). In an ICU setting, patients supported by ventilators should receive additional sedation and neuromuscular blockade if the endoscopist anticipates that the procedure will be lengthy or excessively difficult.
Wireless video endoscopy or video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a noninvasive technology used to provide imaging of the small intestine, an anatomic site often difficult to visualize. The images acquired are of excellent resolution and the procedure uses the principle of physiologic endoscopy via passive movement and does not inflate the bowel, so images of the mucosa are captured in a collapsed state. Primary indications include the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, small bowel tumors, or Crohn’s disease. There is growing experience in the use of this technology for children older than 6 years. Advantages include its noninvasive nature and the ability to examine the small bowel mucosa, which is not possible with push enteroscopy. Disadvantages include the impossibility of any tissue sampling or therapeutic intervention. However, studies have suggested that the overall yield of VCE is superior to push enteroscopy and barium studies.2–4
Gastroesophageal Reflux Monitoring
Esophageal impedance monitoring5 is the preferred means of measuring gastroesophageal reflux among patients who are receiving acid suppression or in whom alkaline reflux is suspected. The intraesophageal impedance device measures total opposition to current flow between two electrodes and expresses the value in ohms. Because air and fluid have different conductivities, the contents of the esophagus can be differentiated at any point in time. Thus when the esophagus is devoid of fluid, a baseline impedance is measured. When a bolus of fluid enters the esophagus from refluxed material or from a swallowed bolus, the impedance changes. These changes in intraluminal impedance thus permit the continuous monitoring of pH neutral or alkaline reflux episodes.
For the ambulatory child capable of undergoing an endoscopy, a small pH transducer capsule can be deployed and attached to the esophagus, being left in place to monitor esophageal acidification for up to 48 hours with an external sensor before being naturally sloughed. The advantage of this device is that nasoesophageal intubation need not be performed, thereby creating a more “natural” environment. For the critically ill, intubated patient, this device is impractical to place and offers no advantage over traditional reflux monitoring.6,7
Use of Colorants to Identify Aspiration in the Intensive Care Unit
Patients who are obtunded or who have been ventilator dependent for an extended time are at significant risk of pulmonary aspiration. A deceptively simple way of documenting aspiration in patients receiving gavage or gastrostomy feedings in the past has been to add a coloring agent such as blue dye No. 1 or methylene blue to formula. The rationale for this strategy was that quantities sufficient to tint formula should be readily apparent when suctioned from the lungs. The fallacy of the technique is that when compared with scintiscanning of the lungs after administration of a radiolabeled meal or with the discovery of lipid-laden macrophages after bronchoalveolar lavage, the use of colorants is notoriously inaccurate. Furthermore, all colorants are dangerous when instilled into the gastrointestinal tract. They are customarily absorbed in minimal quantities, but among critically ill patients, the gastrointestinal tract becomes porous to all macromolecules and appreciable quantities of dye are absorbed. Once absorbed, even minimal quantities function as metabolic poisons, uncoupling oxidative metabolism, thereby resulting in life-threatening metabolic acidosis among susceptible patients.8
Radiologic Procedures
Contrast Radiography
Although endoscopy is more sensitive than single-contrast radiography for identifying mucosal ulceration, contrast radiography remains a valuable procedure in the critical care setting. In general, the upper gastrointestinal tract series and small bowel series are indicated when partial small bowel obstruction is suspected. A contrast enema will document (and possibly treat) intussusception and document Hirschsprung’s disease. The type of contrast agent for a particular examination depends on the clinical condition of the patient undergoing the examination. Although barium sulfate is superior to water-soluble contrast agents for outlining mucosa, its use in typical patients in the ICU is riskier because barium may form a concretion in a patient with ileus and because barium leaking into the peritoneum from a perforated hollow viscus can cause serious peritoneal injury. Hyperosmolar, water-soluble contrast agents are usually not favored because they pose the risk of dehydration. Currently, isosmolar agents are more commonly used for studies on the critically ill patient.
Ultrasonography, Computed Tomographic Scanning, and Magnetic Resonance Scanning
Ultrasonography, computed tomographic (CT) scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) each have advantages and disadvantages. For example, in the slim child with little mesenteric fat, ultrasonography is sometimes better than CT scanning of abdominal viscera. Conversely, CT scanning is superior for abdominal imaging of obese individuals.9 MRI is limited by its inability to distinguish bowel loops from adjacent structures and by blurring caused by motion. It is helpful, though, in identifying vascular tumors, which are seen as low-intensity masses on T1-weighted images and high-intensity masses on T2-weighted images. Ultrasonography or CT is used when an intraabdominal abscess, cystic lesion, hepatobiliary disease, tumor, ascites, or pancreatitis is suspected. In the identification of pancreatic lesions, dynamic CT scanning is a most imaging technique. CT also best identifies enlarged periaortic nodes. CT or MR enterography are other modalities used in the detection of small bowel inflammatory disease. Oral hyperhydration can achieve adequate luminal distension often not requiring nasoenteric intubation. Unlike routine CT or MRI, enterography can display mural changes along with perienteric inflammatory changes with much better resolution. These studies are more accurate than the standard small bowel follow-through or enteroclysis.10–13
Radionuclide Scanning
Gastroesophageal reflux and the rate of gastric emptying can be measured with liquid-phase gastroesophageal scintigraphy.14 Technetium-99 sulfur colloid is mixed with formula or another enterally administered liquid. When there is a scan above and below the diaphragm in 30- to 60-second windows during the first postprandial hour after isotope administration, the number of reflux episodes, the height of the reflux column, and the rate of gastric emptying are quantitated. A 4- to 6-hour delayed scan of the lungs determines whether pulmonary aspiration of that meal has occurred.15
Intraabdominal abscesses and inflammatory intestinal lesions can be localized with radioscintigraphy.16 Leukocytes are extracted from the patient, tagged with a radioisotope in vitro, and are reinjected. Scanning of the area in question is then performed. Technetium hexamethyl propyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) has replaced indium because of improved resolution of HMPAO scans and because HMPAO scans can be completed within 4 hours rather than 72 hours.
Testing for Occult Blood Loss
Occult blood loss is generally determined with the Hemoccult or Gastroccult test; these are modifications of the guaiac test.17,18 They work because hemoglobin oxidizes the reagent to a blue product. The recently marketed Hemoccult Sensa (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, Calif.) slide detects as little as 2 to 3 mL of blood loss per day. This slide is virtually 100% sensitive when blood loss equals 10 mL/day.8
Stool pH and Reducing Substances
Excessive enteral carbohydrate loads may worsen preexisting diarrhea in critically ill children. Carbohydrate malabsorption can be assessed with the measurement of reducing sugars and pH of stool. The two tests should always be used in conjunction because colonic transit time and quantity or type of colonic flora affect either of these tests. Malabsorbed sugars appear in feces when colonic transit is sufficiently rapid and are detected by Clinitest tablets or reagent strips; more than 0.5 mg of sugar per 100 mL of stool water suggests malabsorption. If the malabsorbed dietary sugar is primarily sucrose, a nonreducing sugar, the Clinitest result is negative unless the stool is first hydrolyzed with hydrochloric acid. Stools can be negative for reducing sugars despite carbohydrate malabsorption if colonic transit is slow enough to permit complete bacterial fermentation. In such an event, pH of fresh stool (measured by nitrazine paper) is consistently below 5.5. The pH of samples not tested for several hours, however, tends to rise over time as short-chain fatty acids generated from sugar fermentation are further metabolized.
Life-Threatening Complications of Gastrointestinal Disorders
Esophagus
Caustic Injury to the Esophagus
Despite widespread efforts by poison control centers to publicize the dangers of household caustics, thousands of inadvertent ingestions occur annually; most occur in children younger than 5 years. Crystalline products produce greater damage to the hypopharynx and upper airway because of prolonged mouth contact and a smaller volume reaching the esophagus. In recent years most household cleaners have been reformulated to contain less lye, but pure liquid lye can be purchased if desired. Its resemblance to milk leads to numerous inadvertent ingestions by children (see Chapter 106).
Tissue damage can be caused by either strong alkali or acid. Deep esophageal burns are more common after alkali ingestion. Alkalis produce rapid liquefaction of esophageal tissue, and burns can range from first to third degree in depth.20 An intense inflammatory infiltrate develops, and blood vessels thrombose to produce ischemic necrosis. Perforation may occur within hours or days. Strictures can occur weeks to years after ingestion.21 Esophageal burns occur infrequently after acid ingestion, but gastric or duodenal erosions have been reported.
Symptoms that predominate are chest pain and the inability to swallow secretions. Children with upper airway damage often exhibit stridor. When mouth burns are present, the chances of esophageal injury are 75%.10 Conversely, 25% of patients with significant esophageal burns have no pharyngeal or mouth involvement.20
Treatment of severe stridor should be directed toward establishing an airway, and emergency tracheostomy should be contemplated. Upper endoscopy within 24 hours is advisable. If burns are minor, no further therapy is necessary, and patients are at low risk of sequelae. Third-degree burns require ongoing intensive care, though. The role of antibiotics and steroids remains controversial.12 Although steroids reduce tissue damage when given before experimental injury, recent double-blind clinical trials show no efficacy of steroids in preventing sequelae.22 When third-degree burns are endoscopically evident, a nasogastric tube should be positioned with endoscopic guidance. This tube will enable early feeding and serve as a guide for future dilations if they become necessary. Some surgeons have advocated early placement of gastrostomies and esophageal stents in patients with third-degree burns.23
Esophageal Foreign Bodies
A variety of metallic, wooden, or plastic foreign bodies in a myriad of shapes and sizes can be swallowed by children. All that are lodged in the esophagus require urgent removal (within 24 hours). Even more urgent endoscopic retrieval is required for button batteries or pennies minted after 1983 that are lodged in the esophagus because both are caustic to esophageal mucosa and may cause damage within 1 to 4 hours. The preponderance of evidence suggests that once a battery has escaped the esophagus, complications from an unretrieved battery are rare.24
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Life-threatening events such as apnea and pulmonary aspiration are sometimes attributed to reflux. The relationship between infantile apnea and reflux remains in question,25 but both human and animal data suggest that reflux can occasionally be associated with obstructive breathing patterns. Severe pulmonary aspiration of refluxed material can also take place. A number of protective mechanisms such as an active gag reflex, cough reflex, and laryngospasm protect against aspiration,26 but these reflexes may be lost under special circumstances such as obtundation. Symptoms of obstructive apnea often include a brief episode of stridor accompanied by a struggle to breathe, a change in skin color to red or purple, and finally cyanosis and cessation of respiratory effort. Patients who have aspirated massive amounts of fluid become tachypneic and dyspneic shortly after the meal. Food or formula is often found in the nares or mouth. Cough may occur.The diagnostic modality most helpful in documenting a temporal relationship between apnea and acid reflux is 24-hour esophageal reflux monitoring combined with simultaneous electrocardiography, pneumography by chest wall impedance, pneumography by nasal thermistor, pulse oximetry, and end-tidal CO2 measurement. Aspiration is often difficult to document, but the presence of a new infiltrate on chest x-ray films and a consistent clinical history provide strong circumstantial evidence. If repeated aspiration is suspected, an upper gastrointestinal tract series may reveal gastroesophageal reflux and immediate aspiration of barium; however, aspiration of gastroesophageal refluxate that occurs minutes or hours after a feeding may be missed with contrast radiography. A milk scan may be more sensitive than radiography for documenting this type of aspiration. Children who are not fed orally may nevertheless aspirate oral secretions. The scintigraphic “salivagram” is performed with the placement of a drop of saline containing 99mTc sulfur colloid on the tongue.27 Subsequent imaging permits observation of its handling. Appearance of isotope in the trachea and bronchi confirms aspiration.
When recurrent aspiration is suspected but not confirmed noninvasively, bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage may support the diagnosis by returning fluid-containing lipid-laden alveolar macrophages.28 Aspiration during swallowing and aspiration of refluxed gastric contents cannot be distinguished by this method in patients who are fed orally.