Chapter 77
Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
Pathophysiology
Although the most life-threatening complications of PE typically stem from cardiovascular compromise, PE also impairs gas exchange. This occurs chiefly through the creation of increased physiologic dead space in the unperfused or underperfused segments of the pulmonary circulation. Rising dead space typically manifests as an increase in minute ventilation and tachypnea, but it may also be recognized by a rise in the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Paco2) or a Paco2 that is abnormally “normal” despite increased minute ventilation. For example, an arterial blood gas (ABG) with a “normal” Paco2 = 38–40 mm Hg when a patient is breathing more than 30 times per minute should be recognized as abnormal and highly consistent with PE or another process increasing dead space. mismatch results in hypoxemia that tends to respond well to modest supplemental oxygen. Severe, oxygen-refractory hypoxemia is rare and suggests either significant circulatory compromise (shock) causing a low mixed venous oxygen saturation, right-to-left shunting across a PFO, or a superimposed pulmonary process such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or pneumonia.
Risk Factors
Critical illness, with its resultant immobility and frequent vascular injury, is a significant risk factor for VTE and a recognized indication for prophylaxis, discussed at length in Chapter 12. In addition, well-defined acquired risk factors (Table 77.E1 ) include advanced age, malignancy, vascular injury resulting from surgery or trauma, spinal cord injury, pregnancy and the postpartum period, obesity, COPD, immobility, certain medications, indwelling vascular catheters, and prior VTE. Risk factors may also be heritable thrombophilias, such as genetic deficiencies in protein C or S, any of the antiphospholipid antibody syndromes, or the factor V Leiden mutation, which is the most common genetic risk factor. The presence of one or more risk factors is highly relevant in assessing patients with possible VTE and is included in diagnostic scoring systems.
Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation of PE is notoriously variable and nonspecific. Nonetheless, results from the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II (PIOPED II) trial, involving more than 800 subjects with suspected PE, point to dyspnea, pleurisy, and leg pain as the most common presenting symptoms. Most patients with PE present with dyspnea, frequently rapid in onset, while for almost 20% of patients, dyspnea is only present on exertion and for others it is most pronounced while lying supine (orthopnea). Pleuritic pain is frequent (40% of patients), but nonpleuritic chest pain may also occur. Wheezing or cough is present in almost a third of patients and is more common in patients with preexisting cardiopulmonary disease. Hemoptysis is uncommon, and when it occurs it tends to be scant; none of the almost 200 subjects with PE in the above-mentioned study had more than one teaspoon of blood. Calf or leg symptoms were present in ∼40% of subjects, similar to the first PIOPED study. Compared to those under 70 years of age, patients 70 years or older with PE are more likely to report pleuritic chest pain and leg symptoms. Notably, critically ill patients were excluded from the PIOPED II trial, and are more problematic to characterize with PE as they tend to have competing explanations for dyspnea, chest pain, or cardiopulmonary embarrassment.
Because the symptoms and signs of PE remain nonspecific, the history and exam alone are rarely sufficient to adequately make or exclude the diagnosis, even when the patient is an excellent historian. By virtue of their critical illness, ICU patients are frequently unable to communicate their symptoms and have numerous potential explanations for observed tachypnea or tachycardia, making the diagnosis even more challenging. In addition, unstable patients are often poor candidates for immediate transport to a more definitive diagnostic procedure, and they may have organ dysfunction such as renal insufficiency that make such procedures problematic. The contributions of various tests in evaluating suspected PE are described in this chapter. Figure 77.1 presents an algorithm for approaching the diagnosis of VTE in critically ill patients.
Diagnosis
Clinical Prediction Rule: Wells Criteria
Failure to diagnose PE is a serious management error, as a portion of untreated patients may die. A clinical decision rule (Table 77.1) known as the Wells criteria helps to risk stratify patients with suspected PE to avoid unnecessary testing in low-risk patients. This rule has been extensively tested and validated in stable patients, both hospitalized and ambulatory. The Wells criteria assign points based on clinical signs and symptoms of DVT or PE, risk factors of the patient (prior VTE, malignancy, immobility), and the presence or absence of an alternative explanation for the patient’s clinical deterioration. When anticoagulation was withheld based on a low (< 2) Wells score and a negative D-dimer level, the incidence of VTE in the subsequent 3 to 6 months was < 1%. Although the Wells criteria have not been tested in critically ill populations, its central tenets—assessing the patient’s global risk for PE based on patient historical factors, clinical presentation, and differential diagnosis—remain a rational approach to initial risk stratification.
Other Non-invasive Studies
In critically ill trauma patients, the combination of a 10% fall in pulse oximetry saturation and preserved static lung compliance proved to be both sensitive and specific in evaluating patients for PE. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is helpful in suggesting other potential etiologies for chest pain or dyspnea and may demonstrate signs of acute RV strain (incomplete or complete right bundle-branch block, T-wave inversions in the anterior precordium, or an S wave in lead I with a Q-wave and T-wave inversion in lead III [S1Q3T3 sign]), though these findings are not specific for PE. (For more information, go to www.expertconsult.com.)
Echocardiography
Echocardiography is an attractive tool for the critically ill patient with suspected PE given its portability and non-invasiveness. Unfortunately, echocardiography is insensitive in the detection of PE and cannot be used as an individual diagnostic study. In prospective trials of unselected patients with suspected PE, the sensitivity of transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) ranged from 29% to 52%. However, certain echocardiographic findings are specific for PE, the best of which is the McConnell sign, described as RV-free wall hypokinesis or akinesis coupled with normal or hyperkinetic RV apex performance. At least two studies have reported specificities ≥ 96% for this finding. However, this sign is uncommon and carries only 16% sensitivity, so failure to detect this finding does not exclude PE. Likewise, echocardiographic visualization of clot in the right atrium, RV, or pulmonary artery (via the transesophageal probe) clinches the diagnosis of PE, though this occurs infrequently. Other helpful criteria include elevations in the ratio of RV to LV end diastolic dimensions (≥ 0.7), the ratio of RV area: LV area ≥ 0.66, or the “D sign” or interventricular septal shift, with specificities in the 75% to 85% range. It is worth emphasizing that ventilated patients with severe hypoxemia and widespread hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (e.g., those with the acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) also can demonstrate echocardiographic criteria of acute RV strain or failure, so that this finding is not specific. Because the chest radiograph for patients with PE is rarely associated with the dense airspace consolidation characteristic of hypoxemic respiratory failure, a good practice is to interpret right ventricular echocardiogram findings in the context of the chest radiograph. If the right heart strain is marked and the chest radiograph reveals dense consolidation and the patient is hypoxic, hypoxemic respiratory failure is the likely cause of the echocardiographic findings. In contrast, severe right heart strain in the absence of airspace filling on chest radiograph is highly suspicious for a PE.
Chest Radiographic Studies
Chest Radiograph and Chest Computed Tomography
However, the diagnostic accuracy falls when the finding of a CTA is discordant with the clinical probability. Among low probability patients, 42% of positive CTAs are actually “false positive” with respect to the reference standard. Consensus opinion is to treat such patients only if they have main or lobar pulmonary arterial involvement and to consider additional testing (repeat ultrasonography, ventilation-perfusion scan, or CT venography) for segmental or subsegmental defects. Among high-probability patients, 40% of negative CTA scans were “false negative” (i.e., positive by the reference standard). Thus, when clinical probability is high (Wells score > 6), a negative CTA essentially mandates further testing to exclude PE. In this instance, PIOPED II investigators recommend anticoagulation based on the high clinical probability while obtaining additional testing (extremity ultrasonography, magnetic resonance venography, potentially ventilation-perfusion scanning, or digital subtraction angiography).
Another potentially useful parameter is the alveolar dead space fraction (AVDSf), calculated by measuring the difference between arterial and end-tidal CO2: [AVDSf = (Paco2 – ETCO2)/Paco2]. As dead space rises, ETCO2 no longer approximates Paco2 because no gas exchange is occurring across the vascular beds distal to the embolus, and thus ETCO2 falls. Unless minute ventilation increases, Paco2 will rise progressively until a new steady state is reached (see Chapter 1). One study of hospitalized but noncritically ill patients reported that an AVDSf < 0.15 excluded PE with a sensitivity of > 97% and a negative predictive value of 98%. However, using AVDSf as a diagnostic test for PE is not recommended for ICU patients because they often have other reasons for increased alveolar dead space (see Appendix B for examples) and questions arise related to the accuracy and precision of measurements of ETCO2 as there often is no alveolar plateau in the expiratory capnographs. Nevertheless, an increased AVDSf lends support to a potential PE diagnosis, whereas a very low AVDSf argues against a large perfusion defect.