Could Clonidine Contribute to a Reduction in Perioperative Mortality?


RCT

Sites

Dates

N patients

Inclusion criteria

Rx protocol

Endpoints

Results a

Wallace et al. [13] (2004)

double-blind

clonidine vs placebo

single center

None

190 patients

Randomization 2:1

Rx = 125 Placebo = 65

Setting: NCS pts with CAD or with risk factors

Night before surgery: clonidine 0.2 mg PO + transdermal patch (0.2 mg/day) until POD 4—1 h before surgery: clonidine 0.2 mg PO

Primary: myocardial ischemia

Secondary: 30-day mortality; 2-year mortality

Ischemia: 14 % vs 31 % p = 0.01

30-day mortality 0.8 % vs 6.2 % p = 0.048

2-year mortality: 15.2 % vs 29.2 % p = 0.035 RR = 0.43 (0.21–0.89)


RCTs randomized controlled trial; vs versus; NCS noncardiac surgery; CAD coronary artery disease; Rx treatment; PO per os; POD postoperative day; and RR relative risk (with 95 % confidence intervals). a Notably, even though 2-year mortality was a secondary endpoint, the 2-year mortality rates were comparable with the rates of ischemia, the primary endpoint, so that the study did not result underpowered with respect to such intermediate-term mortality outcome. Conversely, 30-day mortality was only marginally significant



A meta-analysis [15] of perioperative administration of α2-agonists (clonidine, mivazerol, dexmedetomidine) in cardiac and noncardiac surgery—including 661 patients treated with clonidine and seven vascular surgery trials—found reduced mortality and incidence of MI in vascular surgery patients with no robust evidence of significant differences among individual drugs (Table 8.2).


Table 8.2
Features of meta-analyses of randomized trials of α2-agonists (clonidine, mivazerol, dexmedetomidine) which included clonidine and reported pooled estimate of mortality outcomes data


































Meta-analyses

Years

N randomized pts with deaths reported

N studies and drug/surgery

All-cause mortality RR (95 % CI)

Stevens et al. [14] (2003, about mivazerol and clonidine)

1980–2000

2614 Miv 1897 Clo 717

NCS 6

0.50a (0.28–0.91)

Wijeysundera et al. [15] (2003, about α2-agonists)

1966–2002

3176

Clo 661

Vasc 1648

15

Clo 7

Dex 6

Miv 2

NCS 8

(7 Vasc/8) CABG 6

Overall 0.64 (0.42–0.99)

Clo 0.48 (0.15–1.60)

Dex 0.57 (0.17–1.88)

Miv 0.69 (0.42–1.15)

Vasc. 0.47 (0.25–0.90) CABG 0.49 (0.12–1.98)

Wijeysundera et al. [16] (Cochrane review 2009, about α2-agonists, with many prespecified sub-analyses)

1950–2008

3828

Clo 848

NCS 2851 (Vasc 1648) CABG 546

18

Clo 8/18

Dex 8/18 Miv 2/18

NCS 9 (7 Vasc/9)

CABG 7

Overall 0.66 (0.44–0.98)

Clo 0.34 (0.13–0.94)

Dex 1.00 (0.40–2.54)

Miv 0.69 (0.42–1.15)

NCS 0.61 (0.39–0.96) Vasc 0.47 (0.25–0.90)

CABG 0.70 (0.21–2.31)


Clo clonidine; Miv mivazerol; Dex dexmedetomidine; N number of; pts patients; CABG coronary artery bypass grafting; NCS noncardiac surgery; Vasc vascular surgery; N.A. not available; RR relative risk; and 95 % CI 95 % confidence intervals. a= cardiac mortality

There is some supportive evidence of an improvement in mortality by clonidine from a large quantitative systematic review [14], which assessed cardiovascular outcomes and adverse effects of using a number of drugs tested in several clinical trials to decrease cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and included six studies of α2-agonists (clonidine or mivazerol, 2,614 patients). Although the effect of α2-agonists on MI was not significant, they significantly decreased the risk of cardiac death from 2.3 to 1.1 % (RR 0.50, 95 % CI, 0.28–0.91) (Table 8.2) [14, 22].

Finally, a more recent Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis [16] found that perioperative α2-agonists significantly improve all-cause mortality (RR 0.66, 95 % CI, 0.44–0.98; p = 0.04) after surgery, with the most encouraging data pertaining to vascular surgery where they reduced mortality (RR 0.47, 95 % CI, 0.25–0.90, p = 0.02), cardiac mortality (RR 0.36, 95 % CI, 0.16–0.79; p = 0.01), and MI (RR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.46–0.94; p = 0.02) (Table 8.2).

In sum, one small prospective placebo-controlled RCT found a reduction in postoperative mortality with the use of clonidine [13]. The simple fact that there is only one study demonstrating a reduction in mortality as an outcome makes it difficult to make a definitive decision about the use of clonidine. Meta-analyses of clonidine studies and of α2-agonists further support this possibility of a mortality-improving effect, with the most encouraging data pertaining to vascular surgery [1416].

These data are not robust enough to make firm conclusions about its efficacy and safety. Its potential benefits might possibly be counterbalanced by the associated risk of perioperative hypotension and bradycardia.

Currently, and based on the limited available evidence, the guidelines on peri-operative cardiac care for noncardiac surgery recommend that α2-agonists may be considered for patients with known coronary artery disease, or at least one clinical risk factor, who are undergoing surgery [23] or for patients who are undergoing vascular surgery [24] (class IIb, level of evidence: B).

Clonidine has indeed a number of attributes that make it attractive as a potential agent to prevent perioperative MI and death. Perioperative clonidine induces sympatholysis, has analgesic [25] and anti-shivering effects [26], reduces myocardial oxygen uptake [27], and reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines [28, 29]. These effects might contribute to minimize the risk of oxygen supply–demand mismatch and thrombus formation, in turn preventing major perioperative vascular events and eventually deaths.



8.3 Therapeutic Administration


The perioperative scheme of clonidine administration adopted in the main RCT [13] is the following: the night before surgery, patients received a 0.2 mg oral tablet, and a transdermal patch which continuously delivers 0.2 mg per day was applied, achieving therapeutic plasma levels 2 days after its initial application; [30] therefore, they received a further oral loading dose of 0.2 mg 1 h prior to surgery. The patch was removed on postoperative day 4. There was some evidence of clonidine withdrawal phenomena on postoperative days 5 and 6 after patch removal, which suggests that the patch should be left on and allowed to auto-taper as the drug concentration in the patch falls [31].

The therapeutic antihypertensive dose ranges from 0.2 to 0.6 mg per day given in divided doses; this dosage causes dose-dependent adverse effects such as prolonged sedation (especially in the elderly), hypotension, bradycardia, dry mouth, dizziness, and constipation.

Some pharmacological interactions should be noted. Tricyclic compounds and mirtazapine antagonize α2-adrenoceptors, which may result in a decrease in or loss of effect of clonidine. Clonidine may potentiate the Central nervous system-depressive effects of alcohol, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, or other sedating drugs. Clonidine and opioids have some synergistic effects and share a similar distribution in the brain [32], but mediate analgesia through independent receptor mechanisms; however, they both activate the same transduction and intracellular effector pathways. Therefore, clonidine allows us to reduce the perioperative opioid dose, possibly decreasing their respiratory and addictive side effects [25, 33].

The potentially life-saving role of the perioperative administration of clonidine merits further investigation. However, perioperative interventions can have unintended consequences. A large international trial demonstrated that a β-blocker reduced the risk of perioperative MI but increased the risk of stroke and death [34]. Unanticipated consequences appeared to have occurred primarily as a result of clinically important hypotension and bleeding, and also raise the issue of the risk for a possibly reduced ability to afford acute blood loss in the face of variable degrees of pharmacological sympatholysis. Although one meta-analysis [35] suggests that perioperative low-dose clonidine reduces perioperative myocardial ischemia and may prevent perioperative mortality and MIs without inducing hemodynamic instability, at least two meta-analyses [16, 25] provide counterevidence. Thus, caution is warranted in view of reported episodes of hypotension and bradycardia associated with clonidine administration.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Apr 6, 2017 | Posted by in CRITICAL CARE | Comments Off on Could Clonidine Contribute to a Reduction in Perioperative Mortality?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access