I. Executive summary
(a) General description of the business
(b) Business mission and goals
(c) Financial and operational resources
II. Company background and analysis
(a) SWOT: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
(b) Service offerings
(c) Technology
(d) Competitive position
III. Industry and market analysis
(a) Scope
(b) Barriers to entry
(c) Demand
(d) Market share
(e) Customers/pricing plan
(f) Marketing and promotional plan
IV. Strategic analysis
(a) Mission and goals
(b) Operating assumptions
(c) Performance metrics
(d) Time frames
V. Operations and management
(a) Table of organization
(b) Key personnel
(c) Policies and procedures
VI. Financial analysis
(a) Financial statements/forecasts
(b) Capital and operating budgets
(c) Supplemental justifications
VII. Conclusion
VIII. Appendices
Mission Statement
Defining the mission and goals of a simulation center is an essential first step in the business planning process. A mission statement is an internal document that communicates in a concise and specific way what the business is and what it proposes to do. It is typically constructed by answering a series of questions including:
1.
What is the product or purpose of the entity?
2.
Who are the entity’s customers?
3.
What are the entity’s quality, human resources, and/or marketing-related goals?
An expanded mission statement may also incorporate goals of the business in a qualitative and/or quantitative manner and may set out timeframes or other specific objectives of the entity.
A mission statement for a healthcare simulation center may also reflect factors including its:
Profit or nonprofit status or objective
Scope of simulation services offered
Range of medical specialties/groups of customers served
Internal vs. external customer focus
Educational, research, and/or clinical goals
The box shows an example of a mission statement for a medical school simulation center within an academic medical center.
Example: Medical school-based simulation center mission statement
“The mission of the Center is to provide state-of-the-art, realistic patient simulation to XYZ medical students residents and faculty with the goal of achieving excellence in medical education and assuring the highest standards of ethics, safety, and quality for the care of patients of the XYZ Medical Center.”
Market Analysis and Competitive Strategy
A useful framework for analyzing a market and planning a competitive strategy has been described by Porter [5]. He described five forces that drive competition in an industry including the rivalry among existing firms, the bargaining power of both suppliers and buyers, the threat of new entrants, and the threat of substitute products or services.
Barriers to Entry: A Simulation Center in an Academic Medical Center
According to Porter, the threat of new entrants depends, in part, on the industry-specific barriers involving factors such as the economies of scale, capital requirements, product differentiation, switching costs, access to distribution channels, regulatory policy, and other cost advantages unrelated to scale, such as the learning or experience curve. The following is an example of how Porter’s framework for competitive analysis may be utilized in planning a simulation center in an academic medical center.
Economies of scale accrue as a reduction in the unit cost of a product or operation as the output in a specific period of time increases. Scale economies accrue to a medical center that locates and organizes its simulation facilities for ease of use across several medical specialties. Capital investment advantages accrue to a medical center that leverages its existing physical plant, audiovisual and teaching lab equipment, and support staff in starting up a simulation center.
A simulation center may diversify its customer base to secure its competitive position. In its start-up period, the center may plan to target the medical students, residents, and faculty of the medical center. Later, this customer base may be expanded to include other community-based or affiliated trainees and faculty, ancillary healthcare personnel, and/or representatives of health-related industries to gain economies of scale.
A simulation center that is the first to enter a geographic market or that is the first to become known for quality services with a particular customer base secures loyalty and learning curve advantages and increases switching costs for customers who may be presented with new service provider options. These advantages may be bolstered by achieving certification and/or endorsement by professional organizations or regulatory bodies (see Chap. 48).
Academic healthcare training programs also control an important “distribution channel” of graduate trainees and alumni customers based on their long-standing relationships and/or reputation for quality education within these professional groups.
Finally, Porter identifies businesses that gain the most significant experience curve cost advantages as those with a high labor content when performing intricate tasks and/or complex assembly. Healthcare simulation centers require a major investment in human resources to design intricate clinical scenarios and execute sophisticated information technology tasks. Academic medical centers have a cadre of medical educators in place who are experienced in didactic and bedside clinical teaching methods that can be leveraged in the simulated education environment. These skills lend experience curve advantages that reduce costs by facilitating design and efficiency. Centers may also produce intellectual property that provides a source of supplemental revenue, reputational benefit, and product differentiation.
Financial Analysis
Financial projection and analysis of the investments required to initiate and maintain a new center are important business plan elements. The financial analysis section of a business plan must conform to the requirements of the business owners and investors. These requirements will vary by type of organization, size of project, availability of investment capital, and type of investor. Conformance to the business plan requirements alone, however, may not determine the success of the business plan. A study of the relation between the form and content of business planning documents and the funding decisions of venture capitalists found only a weak association and suggested that independent sources of information may be involved [6]. Business planners need to design a financial plan and analysis that presents the most robust cost/benefit projections and targets the needs and interests of the decision makers who will determine the fate of the proposal.
Figures of Merit
Capital investments are, by definition, costly and expected to endure over time. They are therefore best evaluated based upon the cash flows that are expected over the life of the project. Business planners must choose the appropriate “figure of merit” (a number that defines a capital investment’s projected economic worth) to employ in the financial analysis. Given the long-range nature of capital investments, figures of merit typically incorporate the concept of the time value of money. The net present value (NPV) is one such figure of merit commonly used in business planning. It requires development of a set of assumptions that includes the amount and timing of cash outflows and inflows, and a discount rate, or the rate of return desired/expected on a particular investment.
In the case of a healthcare simulation center, the revenues from conducting training courses, certification programs, competency assessments, and other potential revenue-producing activities would constitute the expected cash inflow. Opportunities to reduce costs should also be counted in the cash flow analysis. Examples include the recapture by the center of continuing medical education fees paid to external providers or indirect savings derived from the avoidance of patient safety lapses and healthcare reimbursement penalties. In some cases, clinicians who participate in simulation-based training may be eligible under risk management incentive programs for reductions in malpractice premiums [7], and these should be included in financial projections, as applicable.
In healthcare, long-range investment decisions have traditionally been made based on medical or strategic needs with less of an emphasis on economic efficiency [8]. There are several reasons to avoid the exclusive use of traditional figures of merit such as NPV in business planning. These reasons stem from flaws in the methodology that lead to an underestimation of a business plan’s benefits and a systematic bias against successful innovation [9]. These flaws include the fact that cash flows of the innovative project are compared against a default scenario in which no investment is made, and the assumption is, therefore, that the company’s current success will persist in the absence of the investment.
Real Options Planning
Real options planning is a complementary approach used with traditional figures of merit for the financial analysis of capital investments. It has been described as a technique to “marry the theory of financial options to the foundational ideas in strategy, organizational theory, and complex systems” [10]. The technique shifts the focus of a business from how existing resources can be leveraged for long-term benefit to how an investment in the creation of new capabilities adds value.
Employing a real options approach in a business plan for a healthcare simulation center may involve modeling serial financial investments that will result in a staged implementation of the center. These models would pinpoint opportunities to modify the scale and complexity of the center’s activities as the demand for services develops. This facilitates reduction of the initial capital investment, thereby maximizing chances for the success of the proposal when start-up funds are limited.
The real options approach for a simulation center would provide flexibility by accommodating the redirection of the scope, the specialty orientation, and even the location of the project after startup. This may be necessary and beneficial in responding to rapidly changing needs in the financial, educational, regulatory, or political environment in which the center operates.
A center may also incorporate plans to join with interested parties from industry to work in a joint venture arrangement. This arrangement, for example, could provide synergy in a project where a vendor needs a clinical partner to accomplish its product research and development goals and where an academic or clinical practice needs access to the vendor’s equipment in order to further its medical education and clinical research goals. In this case, a legal review and documentation of the relationship would be required to avoid any potential conflicts of interest. Typically, a contract between the parties would serve to define the roles and responsibilities of the participants, assure compliance with all applicable laws, and define the ownership of any intellectual property and revenues that may result from the collaboration.
The Role of Philanthropy
Healthcare reform is bringing new uncertainties and new cash flow challenges to medical centers that will need to rely more than ever on their diminishing reserves and the debt markets to fund capital investments. This raises the importance of philanthropy as a supplemental source of funding for capital project needs. However, conditions in the economy can present confounding factors that limit access to capital in the debt markets and, at the same time, may influence donor behavior.
Limitations in the debt market followed the financial crisis of 2008 and nonprofit organizations experienced what may have been the effect of the broader market conditions on healthcare gifting in 2009. According to a report by the Association for Healthcare Philanthropy, gifts to healthcare organizations in 2009 fell 11% to $7.6 billion from $8.6 billion the previous year. At the same time, the return that organizations earned on fund-raising investments fell 9% [11]. This report also noted that in 2009, 8 out of 10 healthcare donors in the United States (US) were individuals with a personal connection to the institution and that 27% of all contributions funded construction and 18% funded investments in equipment.
Business plans for healthcare simulation centers should consider the opportunity and availability of funds from philanthropic sources to defray capital and/or operating costs. Fund-raising activities that provide the most efficient return (based on cost per dollar raised) are those that focus on obtaining major gifts and planned giving rather than on holding special events such as charity balls or benefits [12].
Simulation center activities may be an attractive investment for donors in the current climate of healthcare cost control and with the growing focus on patient safety. High-technology medical training methods present publicity opportunities that can be used to bolster a center’s reputation in the community and to attract philanthropy. Business planners should include marketing and development office specialists as early as possible in the planning process to maximize the success of these opportunities.
Supplemental Justifications
The aim of the financial analysis section of a business plan is to show justification for the business’s commitment of potentially scarce financial and operational resources to the new investment. In addition to the financial figures of merit chosen, important qualitative benefits of the planned investment may be included to supplement the financial analysis. Items to highlight in the case of healthcare simulation centers include the ethical, educational, and patient safety benefits of medical simulation.