Meta-analysis
Year of publication
Number of patients
Number of studies
OR (CI 95 %)
OR (CI 95 %)
OR (CI 95 %)
–
–
–
–
Aprotinin versus tranexamic acid
Aprotinin versus aminocaproic acid
Aprotinin versus placebo
Howell [12]abc
2013
15,528
88
0.73 (0.45–1.12)
0.88 (0.50–2.13)
1.11 (0.75-1.53)
Hutton [14]ac
2012
14,773
82
0.64 (0.41–0.99)
0.79 (0.47–1.55)
0.99 (0.72–1.36)
Hutton [14]abc
2012
41,350
93
0.71 (0.50–0.98)
0.60 (0.43–0.87)
0.91 (0.71–1.16)
Henry [13]ad
2011
17,136
85
1.35 (0.94–1.93)
1.51 (0.99–2.30)
0.81 (0.63–1.06)
Table 16.2
Meta-analyses of aprotinin-related studies—mortality and number of patients
Meta-analysis | Number of patients | Number of studies | Number of patients/deaths (%) | RR 95 % CI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
– | – | – | Aprotinin | TXA | EACA | Control | – |
Howell [12]abc | 15,528 | 88 | 6,284/177 (2.81 %) | 3,048/62 (2.03 %) | 1,309/44 (3.36 %) | 4,887/110 (2.25 %) | NS |
Henry [13]d (cochrane): | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
A versus control | 8,876 | 63 | 4,889/116 (2.37 %) | – | – | 3,987/104 (2.6 %) | 0.81 (0.63 to 1.06) |
TXA versus Control | 2,917 | 30 | – | 1,478/15 (1.01 %) | – | 1,439/28 (1.94 %) | 0.60 (0.33–1.10) |
EACA versus Control | 922 | 8 | – | – | 504/10 (1.98 %)
Full access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |