CHAPTER 33 Anesthesia and Sedation for Pediatric Procedures Outside the Operating Room
Advances in imaging and endoscopic technology requests from medical colleagues for support during prolonged or high-risk procedures and concern about liability exposure have led to increasing demands for anesthesiologists’ professional services outside the operating room. In the 14 years since the first publication of this chapter, anesthesia services outside the operating room have increased more than sixfold at Children’s Hospital Boston to over 7000 anesthetic procedures annually. As the demand for sedation services has increased nationally, so also have nonanesthesiologists expressed an interest in providing these services and are often using anesthesia billing codes. Indeed, pediatric radiologists, oncologists, dentists, gastroenterologists, pulmonologists, pediatricians, hospitalists, and intensivists are all able to supervise and deliver sedation. Monitoring techniques, sedative choices, and sedation guidelines vary between specialty organizations. Although the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recently updated its guidelines, the recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology and the American College of Emergency Physicians differ from those of the AAP (AAP et al., 2008).
Requirements for extramural locations
Organization and Administration
A collaborative relationship between extramural and anesthesiology departments is critical to providing safe patient care. At a minimum, safe patient care requires appropriate anesthesia equipment and monitors, adequate space, and experienced ancillary providers who are knowledgeable in anesthesia and facile in providing assistance if needed. Each off-site area has its own needs, goals, and guidelines. It is ideal to designate a team of anesthesiologists committed to providing extramural anesthesia care and troubleshooting the logistical challenges in the various locations. Each member should rotate regularly through the different extramural sites in order to maintain familiarity with the procedures, to foster a relationship with the physicians and ancillary personnel, to understand the anesthesia demands unique to each site, and sharing information about ongoing advances. Technological advances are particularly expanding in the field of radiology, and complicated imaging studies challenge the anesthesiologist to have an understanding of the unique conditions that each study requires. Understanding these requirements will guide the anesthesiologist in developing a management plan (Lee et al, 2008).
In the past, extramural locations were not designed with the anesthesiologist in mind. The need for anesthesia had not been anticipated when off-site locations were planned. It is only within the past decade that the demand for anesthesia services in these sites has burgeoned. Thus, most off-site locations have not been configured to support the capabilities for anesthesia. Ideally, anesthesiologists should be involved in the early stages of site design to ensure that minimum standards for anesthesia delivery are met and to troubleshoot engineering issues and advocate for adequate space for anesthetic induction and emergence (Committee on Drugs, 1992; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Anesthesiology, 1999). Physical plant considerations for MRI-site planning have been previously described (Koskinen, 1985). When anesthesia services are requested, these sites may not meet minimum standards and may require reengineering to meet minimum requirements of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) (House et al., 1994). The anesthesia machine should be equipped with back-up supplies of E cylinders filled with oxygen and nitrous oxide. If pipeline oxygen is not available, then oxygen should be supplied from H cylinders (6600 L) rather than the smaller E tanks (659 L).
Scavenging systems should be carefully evaluated in the extramural location. Unlike the operating room, passive scavenging systems may not always be possible. A safe means of active scavenging may be provided by the vacuum at the wall or wall suction canisters. A scavenging system should be dedicated solely to waste gases. Many MRI scanners do not have wall suction because MRI-compatible wall suction is not widely available. If the suction is located outside the MRI suite, then a mouse-sized hole may be created in the suite’s wall to allow suction tubing to be passed inside (Koskinen, 1985).
Personnel, Support, and Logistics
Leadership is crucial; a director of anesthesia services at an extramural location can orchestrate, facilitate, and coordinate anesthesia services. This director can also serve as a consultant for the other medical and nursing staff. By being available to answer questions, do on-site consultations, examine patients, and provide back-up support or emergency-airway expertise, the anesthesiologist can also support a nurse-administered sedation program. Nurses who provide sedation under the supervision of the ordering extramural physician (e.g., gastrointestinal, radiologic, or dental) should have Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) and Basic Life Support (BLS) certifications. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) (2009) requires that individuals who administer sedation are able to rescue patients from whatever level of sedation or anesthesia is achieved, whether intentional or unintentional. All children scheduled for nursing sedation during a scan should receive a prescreening telephone call from a radiology nurse the day before the scheduled scan. Often, these telephone calls are made after business hours to ensure that a parent is home. The nurse reviews the medical history, relays fasting instructions, and reminds the parent to administer the child’s routine medications with a sip of clear fluid. The supervising physician must give final approval for sedation after reviewing the child’s medical history and current medical status and before ordering the medications. To minimize the chance of drug-delivery error or miscalculation, it is helpful to have preprinted order sheets or a computerized order-entry template.
Periprocedural patient care: standards of practice and quality assurance
The practice standards adopted by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) in 1986 for basic intraoperative monitoring apply to extramural locations as well. Practice standards and guidelines promulgated by the AAP are exceeded by established practice standards in anesthesiology (Committee on Drugs, 1992; Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, 1999). Significant variances may exist when practitioners who are not anesthesiologists administer sedation (Keeter et al., 1990). Practice Standards for Non-Anesthetizing Locations were adopted by the ASA in 1994 (ASA House of Delegates, 1994).
Scheduling and Preparation of Patients
Appropriate planning for an anesthetic begins with a familiarity with the procedure. The requesting service orders the procedure and then leaves the logistics of scheduling to the extramural service. Radiologists recognize that involvement with anesthesia lengthens their total time commitment to a patient and potentially limits the number of procedures accomplished in a day (Winter, 1978; Cremin, 1990). A well-coordinated system to screen patients on the day of the procedure is important. Experienced personnel, ideally a certified pediatric nurse practitioner (CPNP), should be designated to take initial vital signs, review recent medical history, begin IV lines if necessary, and familiarize the family with the upcoming procedure, including anesthesia.
It is not always possible for an anesthesiologist to provide sedation and anesthesia for all children when there is a large volume of cases. A structured nursing sedation program can provide safe and effective sedation. In many hospitals, the extramural department (gastroenterology, radiology, cardiology) outsources responsibility for sedation to another department, which could include pediatrics, hospital medicine, anesthesiology, intensive care, or emergency medicine. After screening the patient, an appropriate referral for either general anesthesia or procedural sedation is the usual result. Because MRI is a unique environment, it is more efficient to have the MRI nurses screen patients before and on the day of the procedure. To ensure consistent decision making, the anesthesiology and radiology departments should develop a set of guidelines and easily identifiable “red flags ”to help in this triaging process (Table 33-1). If any questions arise, additional medical history needs to be clarified, or additional studies need to be performed, the nurse and anesthesiologist confer before making the final decision regarding general anesthesia or procedural sedation. In addition, chronically ill children often have electrolyte disturbances, coagulation and hematologic abnormalities, and hemodynamic instability. A consent for the administration of general anesthesia or procedural sedation must be obtained in parity with policies established for anesthesia in the operating room.
Red Flag | Indications |
Apnea | Documented by sleep study, strong clinical history, or on an apnea monitor |
Unstable cardiac disease | Cyanotic, depressed myocardial function, or significant stenotic or regurgitation lesions |
Respiratory compromise | Recent (<8 weeks) pneumonia, bronchitis, asthma, or respiratory infection |
Craniofacial defect | Potential for difficult airway |
History of a difficult airway | |
Active gastroesophageal reflux or vomiting | In poor control, with or without medical or surgical treatment |
Hypotonia and lack of head control | Patient may not be able to maintain own airway without assistance |
Allergies to barbiturates | Usually the mainstay of a sedation protocol; also allergies to other sedatives to be administered |
Prior failed sedation | Unable to be sedated or unsuccessful imaging study because of excessive movement |
Tremors | Unlikely to be ablated with sedation |
Selection of Agents and Techniques
The selection of an anesthetic technique in an extramural location depends on the patient’s underlying medical condition, age, drug tolerance, and anticipated procedure. The airway management may be influenced by the procedure itself, anticipated postprocedure course (e.g., intensive care unit [ICU] or postprocedure intubation) and past anesthetic course (e.g., difficult intubation). The assistance of an anesthesiologist is often sought when sedation administered by the radiologist has failed in the past; it is important to be aware that parents and radiologists may have the expectation that anesthesia will provide ideal conditions and guarantee successful completion of the procedure (Hubbard et al., 1992).
Premedication has many purposes: the relief of anxiety, easy separation from parents, sedation, analgesia, amnesia, reduction of salivary and gastric secretions, elevation of gastric pH, and decreased cardiac vagal activity. Medications should be adjusted to the psychological and physiologic condition of the patient and family. Parent-present inductions may be offered when the presence of a parent has a calming effect on the child. In the event of potentially detrimental parent anxiety, premedication may be preferable to a parent-present induction (Kain et al., 2001).
Barbiturates may be useful as the sole method of providing sedation. Pentobarbital, for example, has the advantage of providing sedation, causes minimal respiratory and circulatory depression, and is rarely associated with adverse events (Karian et al., 2002). Barbiturates have no analgesic properties. They can produce paradoxical reactions, especially in children. No antagonist to barbiturates is available, thus dosing should be carefully titrated. IV pentobarbital by titration has been used successfully by radiologists while monitoring oral and nasal air flow, oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter (SpO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide, and cardiac rate and rhythm, with transient decreases in SpO2 in up to 7.5% of patients; interventions have included stimulation and head repositioning (Strain et al., 1988; Rooks et al., 2003).
Other studies have described the use of pentobarbital both in the oral and IV forms (Chung et al., 2000; Mason et al., 2001a). For infants younger than 1 year of age, oral pentobarbital is more successful and carries a lower rate of adverse events compared with chloral hydrate (Rooks et al., 2003). The long half-life of pentobarbital (approximately 24 hours) requires careful and conservative recovery and discharge guidelines. The dosage of oral pentobarbital is 2 to 6 mg/kg and up to 9 mg/kg in patients who are receiving barbiturate therapy.
Sodium thiopental in a mean induction dose of 6 mg/kg and a mean total dose of 8.5 ± 3 mg/kg has been used successfully as the sole anesthetic for CT and MRI in 200 children from 1 month to 12 years of age (Spear et al., 1993). Methohexital has a shorter recovery time than thiopental and is more effective than oral chloral hydrate (Manuli and Davies, 1993). Methohexital-induced seizures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy have been reported. Thiopental or pentobarbital are alternatives for these patients (Rockoff and Goudsouzian, 1981). For patients taking barbiturate-containing anticonvulsant medications, a higher dose limit is generally more successful. Methohexital has also been used intramuscularly (IM) for radiotherapy in doses of 8 to 10 mg/kg. The onset time via this route is often twofold to threefold longer than rectally administered methohexital (Jeffries, 1988).
Although propofol does not have a labeled indication for children younger than 3 years of age, propofol has been used extensively in this age group as a means of providing sedation or anesthesia. Propofol sedation by bolus or continuous infusion for MRI scans of the brain can provide successful imaging conditions but with the risk of need for airway intervention and respiratory compromise (Vangerven et al., 1992; Cravero et al., 2009). Fatal metabolic acidosis and myocardial failure associated with lipemic serum have been reported in five children who were admitted to the ICU for respiratory support for upper respiratory tract infections while being sedated with continuous infusion propofol (Parke et al., 1992). Bloomfield and others (1993) have suggested a continuous infusion beginning at a rate of 99 mL/hr until the patients fall asleep (usually over 1 to 3 minutes) and then a decreasing rate during treatment, a strategy that works very well. Patients were typically awake, alert, and taking clear liquids 20 minutes later (Bloomfield et al., 1993).
Opiates reduce anesthetic, preprocedure, and postprocedure analgesic requirements. They are reversible with naloxone. Whereas narcotics may be unnecessary for diagnostic procedures that are not painful, they may be very useful for therapeutic interventions, especially for patients with postprocedural pain. They are also useful after anthracycline chemotherapy, with documented impaired myocardial function (Burrows et al., 1985). Because narcotics depress the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide (CO2), this respiratory depression may be of particular concern for children with increased intracranial pressure. Narcotics may also worsen preexisting nausea and vomiting.
Benzodiazepines have the advantage of anxiolysis with minimal vomiting and cardiorespiratory depression. Diazepam is painful during IV injection and may lead to thrombophlebitis; midazolam is water soluble and therefore may be more suitable intravenously or intramuscularly. The elimination half-life of midazolam averages 2.5 hours, compared with 20 to 70 hours for diazepam (Greenblatt et al., 1981; Reves et al., 1985). Young patients or patients with significant liver disease may have prolonged duration and exaggerated effect of the benzodiazepines.
Preparation of the stomach and aspiration prophylaxis are of particular concern for urgently scheduled cases (outside of fasting guidelines) or when the medical history suggests aspiration risk. If using H2-receptor antagonists, bronchospasm may occur in patients with asthma because of the relative increased availability of H1-receptors. H2-blockers may also inhibit metabolism of other concurrently administered medications. Metoclopramide accelerates gastric emptying and increases tone in the lower esophageal sphincter, but it is associated with a significant incidence of extrapyramidal side effects in children (Sledge et al., 1992). Ondansetron works synergistically with other agents through its vagal blocking actions in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as through its inhibition of the chemoreceptor trigger zone via serotonin receptor antagonism, particularly for patients undergoing radiation therapy with pulses of chemotherapy (Burnette and Perkins, 1992; Figg et al., 1993).
Ketamine has enjoyed great popularity during the past 30 years for sedation, analgesia, or anesthesia outside the operating room because of its support of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Ketamine-induced nightmares, hallucinations, delusions, and agitation are rare in children (Sussman, 1974; Hostetler and Davis, 2002). Karian and others (2002) have reported on a ketamine-sedation program for use in interventional radiology. In this program, IV or IM ketamine was administered in the interventional radiology suite by credentialed nurses and radiologists to patients undergoing select procedures. This protocol has allowed painful procedures to be tolerated by patients who previously would have required general anesthesia (Karian et al., 2002).
Dexmedetomidine, although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for pediatric use, obtained approval in October 2008 for adult procedural sedation in areas outside of the ICU. Particularly for pediatric sedation for radiologic imaging studies, dexmedetomidine alone in high dosages can achieve immobility for MRI and CT examinations (Mason et al., 2006, 2008a, 2008b). Its use for procedural sedation has still to be explored further, because its clinical application has been examined only in small studies and often in combination with ketamine (Barton et al., 2008).
Some patients require general anesthesia because of previous sedation failures, the need for a secure airway, or procedural logistics. Newer, less-soluble anesthetic agents such as sevoflurane and desflurane have pharmacokinetic profiles that compare favorably with propofol in adults; there seems little reason to think that this would not be the case with children, although pediatric anesthesiologists often avoid using desflurane because of its pungency and associated airway irritability (Van Hemelrijck et al., 1991). Since its introduction to clinical practice in the mid-1990s, sevoflurane has become the volatile anesthetic of choice in children. Its lack of airway irritability as a side effect and its ability to provide children with stable hemodynamic function, together with its rapid onset and offset make sevoflurane a useful agent for children (Furst et al., 1996).
Regional anesthesia, rarely administered outside the pediatric operating room, nevertheless remains a valid choice in some circumstances. Intercostal nerve blocks may be useful for lung or rib biopsies, chest tubes, biliary or subphrenic drainage procedures, and insertion of biliary stents. Nerve block of the brachial plexus by the axillary, interscalene, or supraclavicular route has been reported for the brachial approach to catheterization and neuraxial block of the lower extremities for femoral catheterizations and percutaneous approaches to the kidneys (Eggers et al., 1967; Ross, 1970; Lind and Mushlin, 1987). Spinal anesthesia in conjunction with regional hyperthermia and limb exsanguination has been successfully used for repeated painful radiotherapy on lower extremities (Spencer and Barnes, 1980).
Resuscitation
The physicians, nurses, anesthesiologists, technologists, and support personnel must know the location of a readily accessible code cart. In addition, a hard board to be placed under the patient during resuscitation should be available. Mock codes should be performed regularly to ensure adequate flow, teamwork, and delineation of responsibilities in the event of an emergency. The MRI scanner poses a special problem. Codes should never be conducted in the scanner because as support personnel rush inside to assist, ferrous materials that are not removed will become projectile and create an even more hazardous situation. Quenching a magnet should not be an alternative, because it requires a minimum of 3 minutes to eliminate the magnetic field. In addition, inadequate exhaust during a quench has been known to produce hypoxic conditions in the scanner and has resulted in patient death. A “black quench” could melt the MRI coils and require replacement of the scanner, a costly and time-consuming undertaking. Defibrillators are not compatible with MRI and may not function properly when they are exposed to the magnetic field (Snowdon, 1989). In an emergency, a patient should be removed from the scanner to an area outside of the magnetic field. This designated area is a safe place for resuscitation and should have not only a wall oxygen source for a self-inflating bag but also access to appropriate monitors.
Specific extramural sites
Radiology
Computerized Tomography Scan
CT differentiates between high-density (e.g., calcium, iron, bone, and contrast-enhanced vascular and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] spaces) and low-density (e.g., oxygen, nitrogen, carbon in air, fat, CSF, muscle, white matter, gray matter, and water-containing lesions) structures. Because the scan time is quick, CT may be preferable for patients who are medically unstable and in need of rapid diagnosis—for example, with the child being evaluated for abuse, an intracranial hemorrhage, or abdominal or thoracic mass. Other indications for emergency CT scans may include encephalopathy and a change in neurologic status. In these situations, the issues of a full stomach and increased intracranial pressure usually necessitate a rapid-sequence induction with tracheal intubation. A CT scan of the head is often the preferred study in emergency situations where head trauma is involved (Blankenberg et al., 2000).
The actual scanning sequences are short and can range from 10 to 40 seconds. These short scan times enable many children to complete a CT scan without any sedation, especially with parental presence and distraction techniques. When an anesthesiologist is involved, it is often for airway or failed-sedation issues or for a medically complicated patient. An important aspect of some CT scans is to visualize the sinuses, ears, inner auditory canal, and temporomandibular bones and to evaluate for choanal atresia or craniofacial abnormalities. These scans may require direct coronal imaging with extreme head extension (off the end of the table at an angle between 40 and 70 degrees) or absolute immobility for three-dimensional reconstruction, so it is critical for the treatment team to have a thorough understanding of the specifics of the study. Three-dimensional airway and cardiac studies have evolved and have unique anesthetic requirements. The airway studies require breath holding on inspiration and expiration in order to allow visualization of areas with airway collapse (Lee et al., 2008). The cardiac studies are often done in collaboration with cardiologists and radiologists who are able to make structural and functional assessments of the heart. These scans can also be challenging, because adenosine is often requested in order to briefly pause heart function so that image quality is maximized (Woodard et al., 2006).
Any patient who is at risk for cervical instability should be properly screened before neck extension. Children with Down syndrome are at risk for atlantoaxial instability. The incidence of instability varies from 12% to 32% (Blankenberg et al., 2000). Many children with Down syndrome require cervical spine radiographs before entering grade school or participating in Special Olympics. Usually, the parents are well aware of the radiologic findings. The cervical spine films, however, do not indicate whether or not a child is at risk for dislocation (Davidson, 1988). Rather, those children who exhibit neurologic signs or symptoms such as abnormal gait, increased clumsiness, fatigue with ambulation, or a new preference for sitting games are at risk. In infants, developmental milestones (e.g., crawling, sitting up, and reaching for objects) should be verified. Physical signs of Down syndrome may include clonus, hyperreflexia, quadriparesis, neurogenic bladder, hemiparesis, ataxia, and sensory loss. The asymptomatic Down syndrome child with radiologic evidence of instability may be approved for procedural sedation; however, unnecessary neck movement should be avoided. Any child who displays neurologic signs or symptoms should not be sedated until a neurosurgical or orthopedic consultation is obtained.
Radiologists employ Gastrografin when evaluating abdominal masses. Gastrografin diluted to a concentration of 1.5% is usually considered a clear liquid. The volume that is administered orally is significant; newborns younger than 1 month of age receive 60 to 90 mL, infants between 1 month and 1 year of age may receive up to 240 mL, and children between the ages of 1 and 5 years receive between 240 and 360 mL. Because sedation or anesthesia should usually be accomplished within a window of 1 to 2 hours after ingestion of the contrast, most “elective” fasting guidelines would be violated; however, the scan must be completed while the Gastrografin is still in the gastrointestinal tract. There are no published data to guide optimal induction or sedation techniques as they relate to aspiration risk in these circumstances. Full strength (3%) Gastrografin is hyperosmolar and hypertonic. All Gastrografin should be diluted to an isosmolar and isotonic 1.5% concentration of neutral pH. There is one case report of 1.5% Gastrografin aspiration in a child with no adverse sequelae; therefore, the risk of using a 1.5% concentration of Gastrografin seems low (Friedman et al., 1986; Wells et al., 1991).
Embolization Procedures
Interventional techniques include nonvascular and vascular interventions (Towbin and Ball, 1988). In vascular interventions, embolization and sclerotherapy have become important techniques for treating vascular malformations, aneurysms, fistulas, and hemorrhage; for accomplishing renal ablation; and for presurgical embolization of hypervascular masses. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and fibrinolytic therapy are increasing in pediatric institutions; great success is being reported, even in the smallest infants, and the important contribution that adequate sedation and analgesia can make to ultimate outcome has been recognized (Diament et al., 1985).
Vascular malformations are congenital aberrant connections between blood vessels and may be composed of lymphatic, arterial, and venous connections. These lesions, although present at birth, are often discrete and not clearly visible. As the child grows, the vascular malformation may expand rapidly, growing with the child. This rapid proliferative phase may occur in response to hormonal changes (e.g., pregnancy or puberty), trauma, or other stimuli (Jackson et al., 1993). Vascular malformations may be high-flow or low-flow lesions, depending on which vessels are involved. High-flow lesions include arteriovenous fistulas, some large hemangiomas, and arteriovenous malformations. Particularly with large lesions, high-output cardiac failure and congestive heart failure with the potential for pulmonary edema should be anticipated and sought out in the medical history and physical examination. Low-flow lesions consist of venous, intramuscular venous, and lymphatic malformations. Surgical resection of symptomatic vascular malformations may be hazardous as well as unsuccessful—any vascular element not resected may enlarge and cause further problems.
When embolizing vascular malformations, radiologists often aim to cut off not only the feeding vessels but also the central confluence (nidus) where much of the arterial shunting occurs. Embolic agents include stainless-steel minicoils, absorbable gelatin pledgets and powder, detachable silicone balloons, polyvinyl alcohol foam, cyanoacrylate glue, and ethanol. The choice of agent depends on the clinical situation and the size of the blood vessel. When permanent occlusion is the goal, polyvinyl alcohol foam and ethanol are often employed. Both occlude at the level of the arterioles and capillaries. Medium to small-sized arteries may be occluded with coils, the equivalent of surgical ligation. Particularly in trauma situations, when only temporary occlusion (days) is the goal, absorbable gelatin pledgets or powder are used (Coldwell et al., 1994).
Large hemangiomas may be associated with the coagulopathy of Kasabach-Merritt syndrome. In this condition, the hemangioma traps and destroys platelets and other coagulation factors, resulting in thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of bleeding. As the hemangioma involutes, the coagulation status improves (Mulliken and Young, 1988). A condition described as systemic intravascular coagulation (SIC) can occur after the embolization of extensive vascular malformations. This condition is marked by an elevated prothrombin time (PT) with a decrease in coagulation factors and platelets.
Absolute (99.9%) ethanol is injected in vascular malformations to promote sclerosis. Ethanol may produce a coagulum of blood and cause endothelial necrosis (Becker et al., 1984). Sclerotherapy or embolization with absolute ethanol increases the risk of developing a postprocedure coagulopathy marked by positive D-dimers, elevated PT, and decreased platelets (Mason et al., 2001b). Ethanol causes thrombosis, because it injures the vascular endothelium. Ethanol also denatures blood proteins. Extensive ethanol injections can cause hematuria, and urinary catheters should be inserted to monitor urine output, diuresis, and hematuria. Especially with children scheduled for outpatient surgery, liberal fluid replacement ensures that the hematuria clears before discharge. Ethanol can cause neuropathy and tissue necrosis if it is not injected selectively. Using selective catheterization and direct percutaneous puncture, care is taken not to expose normal blood vessels to the ethanol. In addition to the risk of hematuria, ethanol also can produce significant serum alcohol levels. Mason and others (2000) note that up to 1 mL/kg of ethanol can be administered and that serum ethanol levels have been greater than the intoxication level of .008 mg/dL (Fig. 33-1). Patients with high serum-ethanol levels may be either sedated or extremely agitated, depending on their particular response to intoxication.
Cerebral angiography requires motionlessness as well as exquisite control of ventilation. Anesthetic technique, in choice of agent as well as in control of arterial CO2 tension, may affect cerebral blood flow and hence the quality of the scan. Cerebral angiography may be performed in children for the diagnosis or follow-up study of Moyamoya disease, and these children should have anesthetic techniques that minimize the risk of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and stroke during the procedure (Soriano et al., 1993). Other considerations include controlled hypercarbia to promote vasodilation and facilitate access and visualization of the vasculature for the radiologist. In the event of vasospasm or difficult access of small, torturous vessels, locally administered (through the catheter) nitroglycerin in small doses (25 to 50 mcg) may facilitate visualization and access. Occlusion of the venous portion of the arteriovenous malformation (AVM) without complete occlusion of the arterial inflow vessels could result in acute swelling and bleeding. Vascularity reduction through occlusion of major feeder vessels is the goal of embolizing large AVMs before planned surgical excision. This may be accomplished as a staged procedure over several days, involving repeated anesthetics or sedation sessions.
Angiographic imaging may be enhanced through the use of glucagon. Glucagon is efficacious for digital subtraction angiography, visceral angiography, and selective arterial injection in the viscera. When needed, glucagon is administered intravenously in divided doses of 0.25 mg to a maximum of 1 mg. Risks include glucagon-induced hyperglycemia, vomiting (particularly when given rapidly), gastric hypotonia, and provocation signs of pheochromocytoma (McLoughlin et al., 1981; Chernish et al., 1990; Jehenson, 1991). Children who receive glucagon should routinely receive prophylactic antiemetics.
The ability to intermittently assess neurologic function and mental status is invaluable during embolization procedures, but it may not be practical in children because of fear, pain, and movement. General anesthesia permits easier control of blood pressure and ventilation and eliminates the concern about patient movement. For children, general anesthesia is often preferred when performing high-risk procedures that require immobility and periods of breath-holding. Preprocedural assessment should include any history of seizures, bleeding, treatment with anticonvulsants or anticoagulants, neurologic symptoms, and evaluation of intracranial-pressure status. It is important to determine whether the patient has had any TIAs or has evidence of cerebrovascular occlusion. Vasodilator agents (calcium channel blockers) or nitrate derivatives may need to be administered after embolization. Because many patients are anticoagulated during the procedure, a preoperative coagulation profile should be obtained. A variety of anticoagulants may have to be on hand as well to prophylaxis for thrombosis (Bidabe et al., 1990).
Morbidity associated with embolization is not negligible. Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) involving the head and neck often require cannulation of the external carotid artery branches and the thyrocervical trunk. All patients scheduled for embolization should be typed and cross-matched for blood. Those patients who undergo embolizations of AVMs of the head and neck are at risk for stroke, cranial nerve palsies, skin necrosis, blindness, infection, and pulmonary embolism (Riles et al., 1993). It is important to assess and document full return of neurologic status after the patient is extubated.