Viviane G. Nasr1 and Nina Deutsch2 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Affairs Children’s National Hospital, Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA Pediatric cardiac anesthesiology has developed as a sub‐subspecialty of anesthesiology over the past 50 years. It has been practiced since the first patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) was ligated by the cardiac surgeon Dr. Robert Gross in 1938. Initially, in the 1970s and 1980s, anesthesiologists interested in practicing pediatric cardiac anesthesia would spend additional months during residency training or as a staff member gaining experience in anesthesia care for these patients, the apprenticeship model. With further advances in surgical and catheter‐based interventions and technologies in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), pediatric cardiac anesthesiology has evolved in parallel with pediatric cardiac surgery and pediatric cardiology as a distinct field. The evolution of this specialty has led to the establishment in 2005 of a dedicated professional society, the Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia Society (CCAS). Before the advent of CCAS, there were very few resources in terms of providing training and experience in the specific field of pediatric cardiac anesthesia. The board of directors along with other pediatric anesthesiologists addressed the lack of training criteria in congenital cardiac anesthesia and have developed the resources that we have today culminated in recognition by ACGME [1]. Pediatric cardiac anesthesiology encompasses the care of neonates, infants, children, and adults with CHD and pediatric patients with acquired heart disease. Initially, practitioners interested in the field used to spend varying amounts of additional training time during their anesthesiology residency or as faculty members. However, the fields of congenital cardiac surgery and congenital cardiology have made significant strides which required ever‐increasing advances in the anesthetic care of these patients. While the subspecialty initially grew in concert with pediatric anesthesiology and adult cardiac anesthesiology programs, pediatric cardiac anesthesiology is now a distinct field which requires a unique fund of knowledge and skillset beyond that possessed by either the pediatric anesthesiologist or adult cardiac anesthesiologist alone. In order to successfully care for patients with CHD and pediatric patients with acquired heart disease, it is necessary to gain expertise in the perioperative care of all forms of CHD from the simple to the most complex, and the pediatric acquired heart lesions. This includes a comprehensive understanding of congenital and acquired cardiovascular anatomy and pathophysiology. In addition, mastery of patient care along the continuum of care from the preoperative planning period, through the operative procedure itself, and through the postoperative recovery must be appreciated. In light of the wide spectrum of congenital cardiovascular anomalies and each condition having unique management considerations, the pediatric cardiac anesthesiologist must be adept at developing and executing an individualized perioperative anesthetic plan. Importantly, pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists must also master complex procedural skills to care for these patients with abnormal anatomy and physiology which go beyond those used to care for the patient with a normal cardiovascular system. Today, an estimated 40,000 live births/year in the United States are affected with CHD [2]. These patients present for cardiac and noncardiac procedures. Given the increasing demands for well‐trained pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists, it is essential that a cohort of comprehensively trained practitioners of this craft be consistently produced. This is the only viable pathway to further advance the key objectives of providing improved clinical care and enhanced patient safety [3–5]. In 2010, leaders in pediatric cardiac anesthesiology in the United States recognized the need for a standardized educational approach to the training of pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists, and accordingly several program guidelines were developed [6]. In 2014, the Pediatric Anesthesia Leadership Council (PALC) in conjunction with the CCAS recognized the need for a formalized training pathway [7]. They specifically recommended that pediatric cardiac anesthesiology be an additional 12‐month second‐year advanced fellowship following pediatric anesthesia. This recommendation clearly recognizes that attaining skills to become a competent pediatric cardiac anesthesiologist requires training beyond a standard pediatric anesthesia fellowship. In 2018, specific training milestones required during fellowship training were established by the CCAS leadership [8]. At present, the total number of 12‐month positions offered is 28. Figure 2.1A and B represent the number of programs and trainees over time. While the structure of these fellowship programs mostly follows the published guidelines as noted above, it is acknowledged by CCAS leadership, program directors, and individual pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists that central oversight of program quality is needed for educational and training consistency. Hence, as cardiology and cardiac surgery have done previously, the subspecialty has moved forward, aiming for a standardized approach to fellowship training with ACGME oversight (Figure 2.2). Curriculum development should employ a logical, systematic approach linked to specific healthcare needs. The Kern model of curriculum development for medical education could be used to develop a curriculum to teach and learn congenital cardiothoracic anesthesia [9]. This has a six‐step approach and consists of the following: This comprises identification and characterization of the healthcare problem: As detailed above, education in anesthesia for CHD covers a wide range of lesions – uncorrected, corrected, and palliative therapies. The trainee needs to be educated in all aspects of the six core competencies related to these topics. The following points should be addressed to obtain adequate needs assessment: The current state of the pediatric cardiac anesthesia training in CHD was most recently characterized in an email survey performed in 2019 addressed to program directors (n = 19). The number of pediatric cardiac anesthesia programs in the United States offering pediatric cardiac anesthesiology training has continually grown from 2 in 2000 to 8 in 2010 and to 19 in 2020 (Figure 2.1A). Similarly, the number of 12‐month fellows graduating each year has increased (Figure 2.1B). Following graduation, the majority of trainees (75%) work either exclusively as a pediatric cardiac anesthesiologist or divide their time as a general pediatric anesthesiologist and as a pediatric cardiac anesthesiologist. Seven percent work in combined pediatric cardiac and adult cardiac anesthesia programs. The remaining 15% work in a combination of anesthesia and critical care, adult cardiac anesthesia, or other settings. For the needs assessment to be an accurate reflection of what is required, it must involve the current trainees (learners) in pediatric cardiac anesthesia. Attempts should be made to assess the current strengths and weaknesses in knowledge, skills, and performance [10]. The environment in which education is currently happening needs to be evaluated as well. Is the operating room (OR) conducive to the education of some of the complex physiology or should the initial education happen in a simulated environment where the stress level of all concerned is much lower? It is vital that all the stakeholders (trainees, program directors, cardiologists, intensivists, and pediatric cardiac surgeons) are involved in the development at an early stage. Barriers and reinforcing factors that affect learning should be identified early on. Faculty development programs may be necessary to improve the quality of teaching and education in congenital cardiac anesthesia. Needs assessment should also include what resources are currently available to the trainees to facilitate learning in congenital cardiac anesthesia. There is a dedicated body of science, knowledge, and skills related to the unique field of pediatric cardiac anesthesiology. There are chapters on the practice of pediatric cardiac anesthesia in every major anesthesia textbook, every major pediatric anesthesia textbook, and in several major cardiac surgical and pediatric interventional catheterization/electrophysiology textbooks. More importantly, there are numerous textbooks devoted entirely to the practice of pediatric cardiac anesthesia. In addition to textbooks and journals, dedicated pediatric cardiac anesthesia faculty at all the different respective programs constitute a body of knowledge and a source of education for the fellows in the field. The case mix in the training programs, multidisciplinary faculty educators, and access to online journals and educational materials, including the availability of audiovisual equipment, are vital to the success of curricular delivery. The value of the hidden and informal curriculum that is currently in place should not be underestimated. Goals and objectives must, by necessity, be specific and measurable. They should measure the knowledge (cognitive), attitude (affective), and competence (psychomotor) of the learners. The goals and objectives are currently being developed by a task force which is comprised of ACGME leadership, a pediatric anesthesiologist, an adult cardiac anesthesiologist, and representative from the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia and CCAS. The goals and objectives should reflect the relationship of the educational process to the degree of participation of the learners, as well as the faculty response to the developed curriculum. To achieve goals, the program must be structured to ensure optimal patient care while providing trainees with the opportunity to develop skills in clinical care, judgment, teaching, and research. Consideration should be given to the use of learning goal‐scoring rubrics. Meyerson et al. performed needs assessment for an errors‐based curriculum on thoracoscopic lobectomy and structured the curriculum based on their observations using a standardized checklist [11]. The following goals and objectives are valuable in the OR to achieve competency in congenital cardiac anesthesia: The didactic curriculum provided through lectures, conferences, and workshops should supplement clinical experience as necessary for the fellow to acquire the knowledge to care for cardiothoracic patients with CHD and conditions outlined in the guidelines for the minimum clinical experience for each fellow. The didactic components should include the areas in the following list, with an emphasis on how cardiothoracic diseases affect the administration of anesthesia and life support to cardiothoracic patients with CHD. These represent guidelines for the minimum didactic experience for each fellow: The following represent suggested cases for the minimum clinical scope and duration of training: It is important to note that formal guidelines and case numbers are currently being developed by the ACGME task force. They will be available by end of 2021. Table 2.1 Suggested case numbers for Anesthetic Management of Surgical Repairs and Diagnostic and Interventional Procedures Source: Nasr et al. [11]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
CHAPTER 2
Education for Anesthesia in Patients with Congenital Cardiac Disease
Introduction
Why teach and learn congenital cardiac anesthesia?
The current model
Pediatric cardiac anesthesia training
Problem identification and general needs assessment
Targeted needs assessment
Goals and objectives
What is the minimum level of anesthesia training required?
What are the ideal duration, case quantity, and scope of training?
Surgical cases bypass
Case numbers
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome
3
Transposition of great arteries
3
Total anomalous pulmonary venous return
1
Common atrioventricular canal
6
Tetralogy of Fallot
5
Ventricular/atrial septal defect
10
Bidirectional Glenn
5
Fontan
4
Left ventricular assist device
1 Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access