Heart failure is a clinical syndrome of impaired myocardial function where the heart is unable to meet the metabolic demands of the body.
This syndrome can occur from a variety of initial insults to the heart, but the disease generally progresses over time with progressive negative remodeling of the heart unless the initial insult is temporary or reversible.
Disease classification
Heart failure can be seen in patients with both preserved ejection fraction and reduced ejection fraction. Distinguishing these two entities is essential to determining appropriate treatment
The ACA/AHA classifies the progression and severity of disease into four stages:
ACC/AHA stages of heart failure
A
At high risk for heart failure without structural heart disease
B
Structural heart disease without symptoms of heart failure
C
Structural heart disease with current or prior symptoms
An estimated 5 million Americans are living with heart failure and the prevalence is expected to increase 25% by 2030.
Approximately half of these patients have preserved ventricular function.
Etiology
Diastolic heart failure (HFpEF) is typically associated with long‐standing hypertension in an older and predominantly female population. Comorbid conditions of obesity, coronary artery disease, and diabetes are often present. Apart from this classic phenotype, diastolic dysfunction can also be seen in diseases including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and infiltrative, pericardial, and valvular diseases.
Systolic heart failure occurs as a result of a variety of insults. Broadly, there are ischemic and non‐ischemic causes to heart failure:
Ischemic heart failure results from reduced myocardial perfusion from the coronary arteries. Usually this is from underlying coronary artery disease, but can also be seen from coronary emboli or dissection.
Non‐ischemic causes of heart failure can be idiopathic or associated with a broad differential of diseases. These include, but are not limited to, infectious, hereditary, valvular, autoimmune, and infiltrative causes, toxin exposure, arrhythmias, and nutritional deficiencies.
Pathology/pathogenesis
After initial myocardial injury, chronic systolic heart failure is associated with progressive ventricular remodeling due to neurohormonal activation; notably the sympathetic nervous system and renin angiotensin system. This activation causes worsening of ventricular function and disease progression over time and is an important target of medical therapy.
Diastolic heart failure is less well defined. Increased diastolic filling pressures are required to maintain cardiac performance. The mechanisms contributing to ventricular dysfunction despite preserved systolic function include microvascular disease, adverse ventricular hypertrophy, and remodeling.
Prevention
There are many potential causes of heart failure. However, treatment of the major risk factors associated with heart failure development (see Primary Prevention section) reduces the likelihood of the development of heart failure.
Screening
Although patients can have asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction, the ACC/AHA guidelines currently do not recommend periodic screening of ventricular function. However, screening patients at highest risk of cardiac dysfunction (i.e. patient on cardiotoxic medications) is performed in usual clinical practice.
Beyond monitoring of ventricular function, measurement of myocardial changes with strain imaging can detect early cardiotoxicity in patients receiving cancer therapies.
B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a useful biomarker that is elevated in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and has been shown to be a cost effective screening tool.
Primary prevention
Hypertension control.
Diabetes mellitus management.
Dyslipidemia management.
Avoidance of excessive alcohol intake.
Tobacco cessation.
Restriction of sodium intake.
Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis of causes of decompensated heart failure
Although patients can present with asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction, most patients present with signs and symptoms of congestion and/or hypoperfusion. This includes worsening dyspnea on exertion, weight gain, and fatigue. The acuity of the presentation will depend on the mechanism of myocardial injury. For example, a patient with heart failure after an acute myocardial infarction may present with dyspnea increasing over hours or days without significant weight gain or edema. Evidence of hypoperfusion is less common, but is associated with a worse prognosis.
Clinical diagnosis
History
The goal of the clinician when assessing a patient with heart failure is to determine their hemodynamic profile and identify any reversible conditions that contribute to the decompensation. The hemodynamic profile allows the clinician to categorize the patient in one of four categories based on the presence or absence of congestion and perfusion.
Evidence of congestion by history can be observed by symptoms due to elevated cardiac filling pressures. Elevated left‐sided filling pressures will manifest with symptoms due to pulmonary edema such as dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Elevated right‐sided pressures may manifest with abdominal distension or lower extremity edema.
Evidence of hypoperfusion may include any symptom of poor end‐organ function such as dizziness, lethargy, or oliguria.
The precipitant and etiology of heart failure can also be detected by a careful history. Although ischemia is a common and necessary precipitant to consider by history, a wide differential needs to be considered.
Physical examination
No feature of congestion on physical examination should be used in isolation to confirm or exclude the presence of heart failure. Jugular venous distention is not only limited by clinician expertise, but can also be elevated in other conditions including pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, and isolated right ventricular failure. The presence of rales or lower extremity edema are commonly considered by clinicians, however they can be absent in patients with decompensated heart failure.
Assessment of hypoperfusion begins with the evaluation of the blood pressure and heart rate. Hypotension and tachycardia are important markers of morbidity and mortality with important associated treatment options. The presence of cool extremities on examination is an important manifestation of hypoperfusion.
Estimating disease severity and prognosis
NYHA functional class has traditionally been used with demonstrated prognostic power as well as providing help in determining longitudinal response to therapy. However, this scale has many limitations. It has significant inter‐user variability, may change day to day, and is not a sensitive marker of patients at highest risk of mortality.
NYHA class
Symptoms
I
Asymptomatic. No limitation in physical activity
II
Limitations with ordinary activity
III
Limitations with less than ordinary activity
IV
Symptomatic at rest. Unable to perform activity
There are multiple individual factors that can be used to predict survival in heart failure, but no single factor is sufficient to define the risk in an individual patient. Multiple composite scores have been validated to provide a more comprehensive assessment of disease severity and risk stratification. The Seattle Heart Failure Model and Heart Failure Survival Scores are prospectively validated multivariable models that help predict long‐term survival.
Laboratory diagnosis
List of diagnostic tests
Routine testing includes serum electrolytes, creatinine, liver function, complete blood count, troponin, venous lactate, and lipid profile.
Screening for thyroid disease, HIV, and hemochromatosis is reasonable in all patients to exclude potential causes of new onset or unexplained heart failure. Testing for diseases such as autoimmune disorders, pheochromocytoma, nutritional deficiency screening, or amyloidosis is reasonable if there is clinical suspicion.
BNP is most useful to screen for heart failure in a patient with unexplained dyspnea. It can also be useful as a marker of disease severity.
List of imaging techniques
A CXR is appropriate in all patients with acute decompensation of heart failure (Figure 17.1).
An ECG is appropriate in all patients to evaluate for arrhythmias, as well as to suggest the presence of ischemia or prior infarction. An ECG with low voltage despite the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography should raise suspicion for infiltrative disease such as amyloidosis. Conduction abnormalities can be seen in myocardial infarction, myocarditis, Lyme disease, and sarcoidosis.
Transthoracic echocardiography is appropriate in all new diagnoses of heart failure and in patients with unexplained decompensation. This provides useful information in differentiating preserved and reduced ejection fraction phenotypes as well as providing information on the etiology of heart failure.
Assessment of underlying coronary disease can be done by multiple testing modalities. Patients with high likelihood of coronary disease, particularly those with symptoms of angina, should be evaluated by coronary angiography. Cardiac CT angiography is an acceptable alternative to exclude an ischemic etiology of heart failure. Stress testing by nuclear imaging or echocardiography can be used in patients with low suspicion for coronary disease.
MRI can be useful to evaluate patients with unexplained heart failure. Diseases including hemochromatosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, infiltrative diseases, sarcoidosis, and myocarditis can be suggested by MRI findings.
Right heart catheterization is not recommended for routine use in patients with decompensated heart failure. It should be considered in patients who have an uncertain hemodynamic profile and to manage patients with cardiogenic shock.
Endomyocardial biopsy is used in patients with rapid decompensation to exclude a steroid responsive condition such as giant cell myocarditis. It can also be used to confirm infiltrative disease such as cardiac amyloidosis.
Potential pitfalls/common errors made regarding diagnosis of disease
The hemodynamic profile may be difficult to determine in many patients, particularly young patients. They can often present without lower extremity edema, normal lung auscultation, and lower NYHA class despite advanced underlying disease.
BNP can be an inaccurate assessment of heart failure in several conditions. It can be elevated in patients with chronic renal disease. Conditions such as advanced age and obesity can lower the BNP level despite the presence of underlying heart failure.
Treatment
Treatment rationale
The aim of therapy is to quickly relieve symptoms, optimize the hemodynamic profile, manage reversible conditions which may be responsible for decompensation, and initiate long‐term medical therapy.
Characterization of the patient into a particular hemodynamic profile helps guide initial therapy.
Diuretics are the mainstay of medical therapy in patients with congestive symptoms. Dosing needs to be individualized. Initial high dose intravenous diuretics can generally be safely given to patients to rapidly improve symptoms in patients on chronic oral diuretic therapy.
Vasodilator therapy is less frequently used in clinical practice, but can rapidly improve symptoms in patients without hypotension (‘warm and wet’). Vasodilators (nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, nesiritide) reduce the afterload on the heart with subsequent improvement in pulmonary congestion (Table 17.1).
Supplemental oxygen and non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation can also be used to relieve dyspnea in conjunction with vasodilator and diuretic therapy. Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation should be avoided in patients with hypotension, vomiting, pneumothorax, and poor mental status.
Inotropic or mechanical support is used in patients with evidence of hypoperfusion with elevated filling pressure (‘cold and wet’) until the hemodynamic condition is corrected. There are several intravenous agents that can be used for inotropy. Except for cases of profound shock, dobutamine or milrinone are typical first line agents. These agents are continued until the hemodynamic profile is reversed. Mechanical support should be considered in refractory cases.
Although less common, patients who are ‘cold and dry’ will require inotropic or mechanical support while a reversible cause is identified. If no reversible cause is noted, these patients need early consideration of mechanical support or cardiac transplantation evaluation.
After stabilization of the patient’s hemodynamic profile and management of any precipitant of decompensation, patients with systolic heart failure should be initiated on chronic heart failure therapy prior to discharge. Neuro‐hormonal antagonists such as beta‐blockade, RAAS blockade, and aldosterone antagonists are essential to prevent further ventricular remodeling and decompensation. Treatment of diastolic heart failure largely focuses on management of associated hypertension and volume control with diuretic therapy.
When to refer
The acutely hospitalized patient provides an opportunity to assess their overall prognosis and determine if referral to an advanced heart failure specialist is indicated. The following patients are appropriate for referral:
Patients with cardiogenic shock are appropriate for early referral, particularly prior to the development of irreversible multiorgan failure.
Patients who require inotropic support and are unable to be weaned despite correction of the hemodynamic profile.
Patients with intolerance to neurohormonal blockade, particularly due to hypotension or renal failure.
Patients with recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure despite optimal medical therapy.
Prevention/management of complications
Diuretic dosing is often associated with or limited by worsening renal failure. If the patient is developing renal failure with diuresis, it is first important to confirm that the suspected hemodynamic profile is correct. If there is uncertainty, consider right heart catheterization. If there is evidence of hypoperfusion, empiric use of vasodilators or inotropic support can be considered.
Table of treatment for acute heart failure
Warm
Cold
Dry
Normal cardiac output Normal systemic vascular resistance Normal PCWP Rx: Titration of guideline directed therapy
Low cardiac output High systemic vascular resistance Normal PCWP Rx: Inotropes
Wet
Normal cardiac output Normal systemic vascular resistance High PCWP Rx: Diuresis +/– vasodilators
Low cardiac output High systemic vascular resistance High PCWP Rx: Inotropic support and diuresis
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue